The state of wealth

As time goes on, there is more and more anger at the extreme rich, which is confusing to me for a multitude of reasons. There is the argument of wealth hoarding, which is a thing, but not a problem, since in a fiat system there is no limit to the amount of circulated money as long as productivity continues to increase, which it has been. There is the argument of poverty, which is somewhat valid, but is also tainted in a country like Canada where the government devalues currency regularly to print more money in the interest of the people, but that money goes to foreign causes instead of domestic poverty. I don't know, these arguments seem to target the rich for hatred, instead of targeting the poor for compassion.

In a discussion of compassion and suffering, which is what the conversation about poverty is, there is something that sticks in my head. “They don't love the poor, they hate the rich.” It's a meaningful quote from Dr. Peterson, love him or hate him. The owners of billion dollar companies don't hate the poor, they hate poverty and by creating industry and careers, they are combating poverty in their way. There is a lack of acceptance that there are multiple ways to tackle every problem, but to demand that one persons state of poverty is the responsibility of a select few in our society is unjust.

To add insult to injury, we must also take into account the fact that WE are in control of who becomes billionaires to a great degree. We have the purchasing power, and they are selling products and services, and we choose to purchase those products and services. That's how money works, and the market doesn't lie, we want Amazon and Microsoft, we support Intel and Walmart, WE MADE them billionaires. People don't define their principles and values through words and meme's, the define them in actions, and we have shown our support for these billionaires through our pocketbooks, through our purchases. You could have gone to the farmers market to get your vegetables, but you didn't, you went to Walmart. You could have gone to a local coffee shop to buy your triple triple, but you didn't, you went to McDonalds. You could have gone to your neighbor to get your oil changed, but you didn't, you went to Canadian Tire. We determine the course of our country through our actions, all of our actions, not just the ones we post on social media.

I get it, it's hard to make those choices, but the reality is that the people you most often take this out on, the people like me, the small business owners who believe in the power of the market, are the biggest supporters of what you are saying. We buy from one another as often as possible to try to keep small business afloat, we encourage locals to get into business to keep the money in our community, we circulate our currency locally to support our friends and neighbors. We don't blame the billionaires of our society if something doesn't go quite right, or if our businesses fail (well, some of us do, but we know it's wrong), we blame ourselves, we pick ourselves up, we dust ourselves off, and we make a commitment to do it right next time.

If you want to blame someone for poverty, for unequal wages, for wealth disparity, then you should be looking in your fridge, looking at the art on your walls, looking at the furniture in your house, looking at the things in your home, and looking at yourself in the mirror. Think about where you bought the things you are looking at, who you supported by buying them from those sources, and reflect on your buying habits. Without the support of the market, none of these businesses would be where they are, our economy and society is the product of the seeds we planted many years ago, the result of our own greed, and that is the sad truth.

Posted by
Receive news by email and share your news and events for free on goCapeBreton.com
SHOW ME HOW


588 4
https://capebreton.lokol.me/the-state-of-wealth
On wealth, extreme wealth, and poverty
Gov Political Commentary

4

Log In or Sign Up to add a comment.
Depth
Mathew Georghiou Follow Me
Question for you Brian ... and this is not a loaded question or anything like that, I'm truly curious where you stand on this topic: Large companies that make significant profits yet shelter them in tax havens to avoid paying tax in their domestic countries. It's all legal, but how do you feel about that?
Brian Linden My Post Follow Me
That's a hard one to answer since I think it's a symptom of a larger issue. I don't think Limited liability companies should exist at all, I think there should be a requirement for large companies to franchise after a certain size and become wholesale franchisers to both put more locals into business (or close to it) and to keep more profits in the local communities. It would limit the upward trajectory of wealth to centralized locations, and limit the amount of tax evasion taking place through tax havens. That being said, I also believe that it's a side effect of a global economics, and it's unavoidable. I don't like it would probably be my "official" answer to that question, but I understand that if we want to play on the global stage, we need to accept the pitfalls of that stage.
Mathew Georghiou Follow Me
Yeah, tax havens is a tough question that I struggle with as well. Your thought of forcing large companies to franchise at some point is already an antitrust requirement in most industries, so perhaps an expansion of that same law could provide the results you have in mind. And that aligns with your comments about why people buy from Amazon and Walmart ... because they have become so big and efficient that it has become nearly impossible for other businesses to compete. If Amazon, Walmart, and Facebook are ever forced to breakup, it would make for some very interesting times.
Brian Linden My Post Follow Me
I don't like bundling amazon into that same category, amazon pays their people poorly, and that is an unavoidable, undeniable truth, so I'm not going to refute that. However, look at how their platform works, you don't have to work for amazon to make money off of amazon, you can buy your own inventory, create your own pricing, box your own items, and use amazon to sell those items, even if they compete with amazon's own sales inventory. That doesn't seem like a wealth exclusionary concept to me, in fact, it seems like a concept specifically designed to lift people out of poverty. If I were to support LLC, that would be the legal requirement I would place on them, similar to what happened with eastlinks infrastructure requirement to share it with 3rd party providers. I think it's a middle ground I'm comfortable with.

Facebook Comments

View all the LATEST
and HOTTEST posts
View

Share this comment by copying the direct link.

  • Our Sponsors

Using this website is subject to the Terms of Use that contain binding contractual terms.