CBRM Council should consider an island charter. Here's a draft.

One of the common things on the agendas of the recent CBRM election candidates was the development of the CBRM Charter. With the municipality deep in economic crisis, Council will want to draft one as soon as possible.

As someone who likes to contributes ideas, I've made a few attempts at trying to imagine a charter for CBRM. But, whenever I do, I keep coming to the conclusion that whatever charter we have, should be about the island, not the CBRM. This is how I came to imagining a regional government, rather than a chartered municipality. By regional government, I mean splitting Nova Scotia's legislature into two parts: the normal legislature based in Halifax, and a regional legislature based in Cape Breton.

There are people who would like to see Cape Breton Island become a province, but there are a lot of flaws with this idea. Many people in Canada are unaware of the local issues in Nova Scotia. While the fisheries dispute has garnered a lot of attention and rightfully so, our issues with healthcare and municipal underfunding have gone on deaf ears. In order to become a province, Canada would need a constitutional amendment, and I doubt anyone outside of Nova Scotia would say yes to that, let alone those here on the island. Constitutional amendments, like the one in 1982, are best used for major sweeping reforms to the country, and an amendment for the sake of one tiny part of the country just wouldn't be supported by people in places like Toronto in my opinion (Torontonians would probably want to become a province themselves, I'd say yes to that).

The desire for more autonomy here on the island is between us and the provincial government, and it is my belief that the issue can be solved without a constitutional amendment and with little-to-no involvement of the federal government and the other provinces. This is not their problem.

I'm glossing over the benefits here, but they're fairly simple for regional government:

  • We can unite the communities on the island in a legislative manner, and have the opportunity to market our unique culture.
  • We can tailor our initiatives for our specific wants and needs.
  • We can solve our own problems, and no longer fight a constant uphill battle with the provincial government for essential funding.

The idea is that we would have the opportunity to uplift our communities out of poverty, and be able to say that we did it ourselves. The desire of this achievement is the kind of thing that could create positive change in the minds of residents, and establish a culture of inspiration and entrepreneurship across the island, which has been lacking in my opinion. We don't need to antagonize Halifax, all we need to do is to make a proposal in good faith that we believe we can make significant improvements to the Atlantic Canadian economy with a regional government.

So anyway, I have a draft of a Region of Cape Breton Island Act, that comes with three foundational regional bylaws: the Regional Assembly Bylaw, the Executive Council Bylaw and the Amendments and Repeals Bylaw, because I thought it would be neater and more organized if the conditional amendments were in one spot. I structured the documents similar to how provincial legislation is structured, so Council would have an easier time presenting it to the provincial government.

Everything in these drafts are subject to scrutiny by professionals.

I'm not a lawyer or a lawmaker, but I did draft these documents section-by-section. They are complete enough to at least introduce to a committee so the actual lawmakers can make any necessary adjustments. However, I did not draft the rules of procedure for the regional government, because it would take a while and it's not necessary for this presentation.

Region of Cape Breton Island Act: Region-of-Cape-Breton-Island-Act.pdf

Regional Assembly Bylaw: CBI-Regional-Assembly-Bylaw.pdf

Executive Council Bylaw: CBI-Executive-Council-Bylaw.pdf

Amendments and Repeals Bylaw: Amendments-and-Repeals-Bylaw.pdf


Here are some innovations I made to help tailor a structure of government that works for Cape Breton Island:

  • Cape Breton Island becomes officially named the "Region of Cape Breton Island".
  • We would have a Regional Assembly, with one house but two members for every district. The drafts assume thirteen districts, but they could be any number. The goal was to maintain districts of decent size and population, while also maintaining a decent number of representatives.
    • Members of the Regional Assembly, or MRAs if you prefer, would be referred in the legislature as, for example, "The First Member for Glace Bay", or "The Honourable Second Member for Richmond".
    • I copy+pasted the part in the House of Assembly Act relating to a Mi'kmaq representative, so there is a Mi'kmaq MRA in addition to the districts.
    • The elections use a pick-two voting system. In earlier versions of the draft, I was going to include ranked-choice voting for one representative every two years, but then I realized that it would only lead to wasted campaigning costs for the person who would always come in second-place every two years, because a party can run for both seats in a district under this model. Using pick-two every four years, you still have the opportunity to vote for the left/right (likely to be Liberal or Conservative) and for your personal preference, and the second-place person wouldn't be out of their luck all of the time.
  • There is a "County Chamber", which means that there is one county vote for the districts in each county. Whenever the majority of the MRAs in a county vote yes on a bill, their county vote counts as a yes. Otherwise, the county vote is a no, or not counted if the respective MRAs are absent from the decision. The purpose of the County Chamber is to help leverage the interests of the other counties outside of the CBRM, since a lot of our population is located here. Based on 13 districts (8 for CBRM, 3 for Inverness, 1 for Richmond and 1 for Victoria), that's 30 votes in total, 17 of which are from the CBRM, or 56.67%, which is a lot smaller than the 71.73% based on population in 2016 (and likely to grow if CBRM urbanizes as a result of a regional government).
    • It's not mentioned in the drafts, but the Speaker in the case of a County Chamber would be required to always vote on decisions in order to contribute to their county vote. A tie would be counted in the negative.
  • Our equivalent of a Premier would be the Regional Minister, and our equivalent of a Lieutenant Governor would be the Chief Commissioner. Like a territorial commissioner, except it says Chief in front of it.
  • I included a specific way of how the Regional Minister is chosen. An MRA, the current Regional Minister, or the leader of a registered party can be nominated by their party or an independent MRA, and the Assembly chooses by ranked-choice who becomes Regional Minister. It's similar to how a government continues the way it is under the Premier system after being reelected, but in this case sometimes when you elect a minority government you could end up with a Regional Minister from another party. The reason why I did this is because as an island of only 130,000 people and 26/27 members in the Assembly, even with a majority government there would likely be members from other parties chosen as cabinet ministers, so I wanted to make sure that the bylaws support the normalizing of coalition governments.
  • I changed the cabinet ministries a bit. I replaced the Minister of Acadian Affairs, the Minister of African Nova Scotian Affairs and the Minister of Gaelic Affairs with the Minister of Linguistic and Historical Communities Affairs, the Minister of Mi'kmaq Affairs and the Minister of Visible Minorities Affairs. The reason why I did this was to be more general, but also because going forward, if we want to prevent international students from booking it to Toronto after they graduate from CBU, we need to start incorporating them (Punjabi speakers in particular as of lately) into our government affairs.
  • There would be a transition period:
    • Year one (or two if necessary). Only MRAs and government staff, to prepare bylaws to replace provincial laws. Still under provincial laws and taxes. Budget handled by provincial government.
    • Year after one/two. Regional bylaws and taxes take effect, and regional government has authority over budget, but it is still transferred from the provincial budget (likely an amount to make sure that both budgets have the same budget-to-GDP ratio).
    • Every year afterward. Budget based on tax revenues and federal transfers. Equalization would be distributed through the transfer to the province by a formula that the regional and provincial governments agree to, but I included a part in the Act that gives the federal government full permission to override the "without altering the legislative authority of the provincial legislatures" part of section 36 of the Constitution, so we could be removed from the equalization formula and transferred a completely different transfer designed specifically for Cape Breton Island, agreed to between the regional and federal governments.
  • Until the regional bylaws and taxes come into effect, the provincial government would have full authority over our elections, budget and freedom of information rules, however they see fit.
  • Whenever there is a constitutional amendment for the country, the Regional Assembly's votes are transferred proportionally into provincial MLA votes. So for example, based on our current 8 electoral districts, if 16/31 regional assembly votes are for a yes on the amendment, that's 4/8 for yes, 3/8 for no, and another 1/8 for no because the final contested vote does not have a majority for a yes.
    • The Regional Assembly can participate in provincial decisions during the transition period, but I only recommend it for very important matters because otherwise it's just a waste of time. In these cases, the final contested vote is simply omitted from the decision, so the 16/31 scenario would be a 4/8 for yes and a 3/8 for no.
  • There would be a Minister responsible for the Region of Cape Breton Island Act. An MRA can be chosen as this minister, but MRAs cannot be chosen for any other provincial cabinet office, and MLAs cannot be chosen for any regional cabinet office.

The transition period wouldn't be that difficult. I'd estimate the costs would be under $50M, most of which would go towards lawmakers and incentives for advisory councils to help expedite the transitional process of each department. Expect these groups to prepare omnibus bills (big bylaws containing smaller bylaws related to a particular topic), so instead of trying to have over a hundred bylaws in one year, it's just one for every department and miscellaneous things like agencies, limiting the government to just a few dozen decisions during the second half of the year, so the first half can be spent working in the committees and drafting everything.

We could use the Sherwood Park building on Terrace St in Sydney as the government building until a more suitable building is made available or built. The classrooms could be retrofitted as offices, the cafeteria could be turned into a press conference room, and if I remember correctly from when I attended the school from 2007-2010, there are a few large classrooms that could be used for caucus meetings, committees and the legislative room. I don't know what the gym would be used for, maybe for community events not related to the government.


Well, that's the draft. If you like these ideas, let your new councilor know that you would like to see them in the charter committee. I also recommend that the new council discusses the idea of a regional government with the other municipalities and Mi'kmaq communities on the island. The more that are in agreement, the more credibility we have when sending the proposal to the provincial government.

You can check out my Patreon if you would like to support my work: https://www.patreon.com/keithmacdonald

Posted by
Receive news by email and share your news and events for free on goCapeBreton.com
SHOW ME HOW


602 5
https://capebreton.lokol.me/cbrm-council-should-consider-an-island-charter-heres-a-draft
Forming a regional government could help Cape Breton Island grow the Atlantic Canadian economy and relations with Halifax and the rest of Canada.
Gov Political Commentary Location CBRM Location Inverness Location Richmond Location Victoria

5

Log In or Sign Up to add a comment.
Depth
Joe Ward Follow Me
This is very interesting, Keith. You're probably the first to actually provide a recommendation that effectively achieves a similar level of autonomy to provincial status, without requiring authorities beyond the province to authorize it. That's the kind of innovative thinking we need! At first glance, I'm not sure why the province would be incentivized to agree to this regional charter approach that effectively is a charter so powerful it mirrors what the province can do itself. Another key hurdle is that the entire island isn't uniform in its desires. Even the very earliest desire for independence from the mainland government had a mixed reaction across the island.
Keith MacDonald My Post Follow Me
Yeah, it's unfortunate we're not as united on things as we should. I hope my idea isn't too far fetched, but I tried to have a grounded approach to full autonomy. I'm interested to see what people would like to include in a CBRM charter though.
Joe Ward Follow Me
I think of it as a scale of 0 to 100, as a measurement of the proposed *increase in autonomy*. 0 is a rigid application of the MGA as-is without revisions. 100 is near-full autonomy, the very last measure of power before actually becoming a provincial or territorial entity. I think you've turned the dial up to 100. I suspect it's still incredibly unlikely, but less so than provincial or territorial status. You may have raised the point that the greater power we gain in a charter (or changes to the MGA), the closer we approach the scale of autonomy that would represent a form of much greater independence in governance. And there is a great deal of value in the approach you are taking. In a way, I've talked about level 25/100 solutions. E.g. grant the ability to set tax rates and to create criteria for rebating or charging less. My worry sometimes is that pursuing a municipal charter becomes incredibly difficult (and extended into the future) once every different stakeholder comes forward to have their agenda represented, even in the case where there isn't a clear mapping to their concern and an appropriate granting of power for the MGA. I think some things may be best "al la carte" (added on behalf of a requesting municipality), and many things "for all" (added into the MGA itself). If we had an MGA that created greater autonomy, we'd have uniformity in power, without having to develop charters in the first place. One starting point might even be granting individual municipal/town governing units the power to alter their participation in the capped assessment program.
Mathew Georghiou Follow Me
Keith, you seem to have put more work into this than our previous mayor did in his 8 years ... and with the Charter twice being a top campaign promise. You deserve a portion of the $1 million in salary paid over those years. Personally, I do not believe in having a Charter. You see, there are 50 municipalities in Nova Scotia and imagine if they all wanted a Charter. Consider the community meetings, bureaucratic activity, legal reviews, and the enormous amount of social and political capital needed to create and manage just a few charters in the province. It would be incredibly inefficient. And, consider that our previous mayor and council couldn't even copy and paste a simple bylaw to manage ugly signs. Doesn't provide much confidence for doing something more meaningful. But, here's to hoping the new mayor and council will be more productive. Instead of a Charter, the province should update (modernize!) the Municipal Government Act (MGA) so that it gives all 50 municipalities the tools needed to make better decisions at a local level. I'm sure some people will cry that our needs are unique. But, they are mostly wrong because much of what we need in a governance document is what most other municipalities need as well. It can be drafted to provide enough flexibility for each municipality to apply the tools it needs when it needs them, without so much flexibility that we lose oversight. And, the province needs to take action when a municipality violates the MGA in a way that is contrary to public trust. We've had these violations in CBRM with no consequences. What use is a governance document when there are no consequences to following the rules? If there are no consequences, we don't need a Charter because we can just make up any rules we want anyway :-)
Michael MacNeil Follow Me
Never read the whole article through yet but I like the idea of the whole island being a regional government within Nova Scotia. I always thought with our large population of First Nations and mixture of other cultures that we should be a unique territory of Nova Scotia. I don’t agree with separation but we definitely need to control more of our destiny because we are unique. It maybe a way to change the way equalization is shared . It may also be a way that we could collect our own property tax from Nova Scotia power and in the near future collect revenue from NS Power with the sale of green energy. Whatever happens you certainly deserve credit for putting together what a charter may look like . Well done

Facebook Comments

View all the LATEST
and HOTTEST posts
View

Share this comment by copying the direct link.

  • Our Sponsors

Using this website is subject to the Terms of Use that contain binding contractual terms.