Conservative MLAs Giving Up Chance To Reform NS Health Care

Conservative MLA Eddie Orrell announced on Friday that after having a "heart-to-heart" with Andrew Scheer, he wants to run federally as a Member of Parliament and will be seeking his party's nomination. MLA Alfie MacLeod is widely expected to do the same soon.

Since Orrell's announcement, I've commented several times that doing so would be effectively "abandoning ship". However, with what seems like a blue wave of Conservative support overtaking the country, I'm not entirely sure the idea of abandoning ship is the right metaphor to suggest. Maybe a better metaphor is sabotaging the ship's hull or snatching defeat from the jaws of victory. I'll explain.

The provincial PCs are in excellent shape right now with Houston at the helm, and surrendering these two seats could be a difference maker in favour of the declining Liberals. Just imagine the political legacy of being the one who caused your party to miss a majority by one seat.

Recent polls have not only suggested that Premier McNeil is potentially the least popular premier in Canada, but also that PC leader Tim Houston is closing the gap and setting the stage for a potential Conservative majority in Nova Scotia. Conservative voters need to take a pause and reflect on what that actually means for the people that live in this province.

With a majority, Orrell and MacLeod would not only get the chance to start leading health care reform in Nova Scotia but also making sure that PC leader Tim Houston follows through with his pledge of $15 Million more for the CBRM.

Giving up their seats and aspiring to replace the retiring Cuzner and Eyking surrenders their opportunity to play a part in doing so. And it's the people of Cape Breton that will pay the price for that decision if things go wrong.


These Conservative MLAs really couldn't be in a much better position right now to do good things for their Cape Breton constituents - if they stay put and follow through with unfinished business.

And despite that opportunity to help bring the Houston government into reality, it looks like they may both be directing their attention at personal goals of achieving higher office in Ottawa instead.

While I've joked that this makes them #secondpensionpoliticians (a sore spot for many voters who work a lifetime to achieve just one modest pension), the reality is that these men will have to do a lot to justify Federal runs to smart Cape Breton voters. Even if they successfully made their way to Ottawa, they'd be just two freshman MPs dropped into a much bigger and more sophisticated fishbowl than they've ever been in before.

Rodger Cuzner and Mark Eyking spent their entire careers without cabinet appointments and might end up being most affectionately remembered for political poetry and helping a beaver cross the road. And there are no clear qualifying criteria from either Orrell or MacLeod that jumps out as a strong case for them having a chance at making more of an impact than their Liberal predecessors.

At the provincial level, they have that chance now. But all signs seem to point to their willingness to surrender it.

"It’s well known that I backed another candidate other than the person who won the leadership race," Orrell told the Chronicle Herald referring to the new leader, Tim Houston. Although Orrell also pledged his loyalty to Houston as his leader in the same interview and suggested he'd do whatever he could to help get him elected, his comments weren't entirely convincing:

“I played a lot of hockey and team sports over the years... Sometimes, I didn’t necessarily like the coach but the coach is always right, no matter what happens. I’m a team player and he’s my leader and he will be my leader.” - MLA Eddie Orrell (referring to PC leader, Tim Houston's victory)

While the most rational argument is for Orrell and MacLeod to stay at their provincial posts to get the job done, they'll still have supporters if they abandon them. Both men are well liked, and Cape Breton voters often forget that a politician's choices affect all of the people in their community. We think in terms of what is best for the nice guy or nice gal, instead of what is best for everyone that lives on the island.

Imagine jumping ahead a few years into the future, and we could find ourselves asking if Orrell/MacLeod had stayed on as MLAs, could we have prevented a hospital closure, and would we have $15 Million more available to run the CBRM?

Even with this bigger picture perspective, some of the strongest advocates for health care in Cape Breton seem ready to pat Orrell on the back and wish him well. Indeed, we see many instances of what Behavioral Economics Professor Dan Ariely would call being "predictably irrational" right here in Cape Breton.


Maybe these two MLAs would be stronger negotiators at the Federal level than we realized. Thus far, someone clearly found a way to somehow convince Cecil Clarke that he wasn't the defacto candidate to run for Sydney-Victoria. Orrell and MacLeod (before he even announces officially) must be considered the frontrunners to represent Andrew Scheer's hopes to become Prime Minister, while Clarke is preoccupied with declaring library projects "dead" simply because there is confusion over how to apply for funding properly.

But the biggest question still remains unclear:

Why would these two MLAs abandon health care just before they have the chance to take the lead?

NOTE: The views expressed above are my own and do not represent lokol (goCapeBreton.com). Read more

Posted by
Receive news by email and share your news and events for free on goCapeBreton.com
SHOW ME HOW


1,809 8
https://capebreton.lokol.me/conservative-mlas-giving-up-chance-to-reform-ns-healthcare
Gov Political Commentary

8

Log In or Sign Up to add a comment.
Depth
Lloyd Allan MacPherson Follow Me
Short answer, because ol' Tim is likely not a fan... Eddie/Alfie - few questions: 1. Can you find copies in provincial Hansard of you addressing the current funding parameters of the Health Accord? 2. Do you have a record of bringing these funding issues to Ottawa? 3. Have you talked to your constituents about the decrease in the federal transfer in 2014 under Harper and how this is the fallout we are experiencing easily predicted by the Canadian Health Coalition & Ontario Health Coalition? 4. How is it justified in a place like Cape Breton that the Canadian Health Transfer becomes attached to economics at a time when health care is needed the most (when there IS economic hardship). 5. How would you look to your party if you took on Harper's defunding the Health Accord in the way that local people truly need? (keep in mind, the escalator dropped to three percent or the equivalent of GDP growth, whichever is greater, from 6% at a time when Canada's older age demographic was ballooning. So the fact remains, it's very difficult to see how outspoken you've been on this matter unless all your true movements have been from behind closed doors without the public knowing. So we know your key platform piece is "healthcare" - I'm sure you'll have no problem addressing some of these issues found in a simple search.
Charles Sampson Follow Me
Great questions Lloyd MacPherson. What we are, however, again experiencing is the political manifestation of how continuing to rely on party politics and at the same time expecting politicians to break with what is in “their” personal financial interest by being a party loyalist. While continuing to believe having someone on the government side of this corrupt party system is a good thing - after a history of such failed experiences - It is time to really recognize this mistaken belief is a complete failure. The behaviour of ALL governments is to manipulate the electorate. This is achieved by not being transparent and accountable for their action. Whenever government is challenged by citizens, the government response is to deny information being sought or send a standard political statement that avoids answering the question(s). This government corruption is clearly in view now to citizens - or it should be to those following the Equalization and the healthcare crises affecting this community. If people are going to seek change, it will not happen by re-electing the same politicians - no matter the level of government office sought - who have created or been party to these crises and injustices to this community.
Lloyd Allan MacPherson Follow Me
I agree Charles and people who see this as perhaps too negative a position to have against democracy dictates should start to explain how what has been exposed in this region in terms of constitutional/health/environmental reforms over the decades, is in conflict with our current status. It is a well-predicted decline performed by the advocacy groups. It's amazing what 20 years will do for a region. The good news is that it appears we are not going to sit idle. Governance levers are about to be applied in the region (including economic) and developers appear to be standing by. I honestly don't know what we'd do without the fine work of the NSEF documenting this process for as long as you have. You've not only kept the fire burning but appear to have given it legs in Ottawa.
Michael MacNeil Follow Me
Good bye We dont need two opportunist representing us at this critical time. Imagine the two of them wanted Cecil as premier. I will challenge both of them. If they really care about Cape Breton to donate their second salary to the local food banks
Lynn Hussey Follow Me
Sadly it's not what 'they can do for us' it's all about what 'they' can do for themselves..shows the lack of interest in helping Cape Breton.
Lloyd Allan MacPherson Follow Me
Imagine political representation where consensus is drawn from public and consultation allows for discovery of solutions. We all know what that looks like when democracy is being dictated through party lines - regions suffer for predictable reasons and the advocacy groups have made that aware. We have a voice - we now have to show we have legs too.
Lynn Hussey Follow Me
Great points being made..isn't that how it 'should' be? So Why have we allowed this to happen to us/there are enough who have a voice to demand it be otherwise so what's our problem? We Know the answers but we fail to act on it..that's what frustrates me.
Lloyd Allan MacPherson Follow Me
Hold tight. There are a number of globally-sourced litigious items in play - human rights (including a global on the environment *ocean protection*). Please bear with us for one more moment. I keep telling people when the true introverts show up, we are in deep trouble because they will have been working on the solution for quite some time, awaiting the right people to come together. The only thing I bring to the table is the ability to craft a message over all available disciplines/frequencies at the same time. Photo/graphic/web/fundraising/music - digital discipline and I'm not the first polymath in my family. There's also a business background that was recognized at the age of 24 on a successor/VP level to a 22 location corporation/franchise network in the education sector (government/financial contractor private school) but that doesn't compare to what I was able to accomplish in the state of Pennsylvania with that call centre...haha. #1, of 40 global locations including an employee base of 20K. We were at the top of our game the whole time I was around for some reason. I'm hoping it might come in handy someday when men start listening to women about the state of the oceans.

Facebook Comments

View all the LATEST
and HOTTEST posts
View

Share this comment by copying the direct link.

  • Our Sponsors

Using this website is subject to the Terms of Use that contain binding contractual terms.