Dear Tories: Cecil Clarke Won't Take On Trudeau, He'll Become Him

Cecil Clarke is travelling the province of Nova Scotia while collecting a full-time CBRM mayoral salary. In the process of seeking the PC leadership, he'll do whatever he can to get the job he wants. That ranges from masking his "promises"-style campaigning under the guise of "grassroots" or "listening" to bleeding fellow candidate John Lohr dry of his supporters - drafting everything Lohr builds support with. The result of these strategies is why we're hearing Cecil's turkey pledge or his boasts of how he'll take on Justin Trudeau.

Will Clarke be able to take on Trudeau, or just emulate his worst characteristics?

For the rest of the article, the following video is a prerequisite. Please watch it first, before continuing. Within the video, you'll see examples of very similar behaviour from Justin Trudeau and Cecil Clarke as both men refuse to answer the direct questions they are asked.


I don't buy into the idea of Clarke being able to be a tough negotiator with the Federal government. Trudeau wouldn't need his boxing skills to quickly swat Clarke away.

Unlike Tim Houston, Clarke isn't skilled in a debate as it pertains to effectively arguing a point and advancing his position. He's skilled in debate in the sense of mumbling and avoidance as the video shows.

When Justin Trudeau sits silently in the House of Commons refusing to answer a question, how is that any different than Cecil Clarke sitting before the CBRM Council and refusing to answer a question?

Here in the CBRM, we have to pay him while he campaigns for another job, but he doesn't have to tell us his intentions whether he wins or loses.

His closest allies like Councillor George MacDonald aren't concerned with Clarke refusing to answer the question raised by Councillor Ray Paruch, because MacDonald likely already knows the answer as a loyal member of the inner circle of ole boys

Paruch asked:

Would Cecil Clarke resign as mayor if he was chosen by PC members as the party leader?

Cecil Clarke doesn't think the CBRM deserve to know the answer.

Fortunately for the PC Party of Nova Scotia, they do have a leadership candidate who excels in communication, one who is skilled in debate, and one who clearly knows how to take the government to task.

If the party elects Tim Houston as the leader, they won't have to worry about Cecil Clarke starting the job as PC leader and then acting like Justin Trudeau instead of taking him on. Here's what a real leader looks like:

NOTE: The views expressed above are my own and do not represent lokol (goCapeBreton.com). Read more

Posted by
Receive news by email and share your news and events for free on goCapeBreton.com
SHOW ME HOW


1,004 4
https://capebreton.lokol.me/dear-tories-cecil-clarke-wont-take-on-trudeau-hell-become-him
Gov Political Commentary

4

Log In or Sign Up to add a comment.
Depth
Brian Linden Follow Me
There is an awful lot of conjecture and bias in this piece, which is hard enough to read, but what you don't seem to understand is the difference between operational strategy and political values. *His methods are the same as Justin Trudeau, he's just going to be another Trudeau and not stand up to him*, well, Trudeau's operational strategy worked, he's now the Prime Minister, why wouldn't he emulate the tactics that work and apply them to his own political values. Over all, I do see where you are coming from, and I understand your concerns, but the logic of your arguments are more than a little flawed.
Joe Ward My Post Follow Me
Hi Brian, thank you for the feedback. My title is hyperbolic when I suggest "he'll become him". A more specific suggestion is that I've provided a clear example of Clarke exhibiting the same behaviour that - when it was done by the Prime Minister - was much derided by the Tories. I understand the difference between operational strategy and political values. What was demonstrated by both men is an operational strategy that runs counter to my own, and many non-partisan *and* partisan voters. With that said, there are all kinds of operational strategies that are "successful" in one way or another, whether or not they are ethical or appreciated. Society is filled with many successes achieved with a more Machiavellian approach. It's quite possible that Clarke could be elected as PC leader, and that would indicate that (taken together) his political "operational strategy" helped him successfully achieve his goal. Yet that is not mutually exclusive with the idea that he might also be an ineffective PC leader once in the role. Nothing about my article defies that notion. On the flip side, if Tim Houston did not become the PC Party leader, it's my assertion that the most competent leader being overlooked would be a clear lost opportunity for the PC Party of Nova Scotia. I see Clarke's chances in a provincial election as leading a performance on par with that of Jamie Baille at best. If Clarke's demonstration of a lack of transparency reflects upon his political values and it's reflected in his "tactics", I don't share or respect that political value. Avoidance of a question that can be answered directly is rarely regarded as a positive behaviour and I find it highly problematic whether it's Clarke or Trudeau doing it.
Brian Linden Follow Me
That actually clears the article up a great deal. Now I can say I agree 100%, though being a Cape Bretoner myself I would rather see anyone from CBRM in the provincial lead than a haligonian at this point. I just wish we had a better candidate than Clarke.
Joe Ward My Post Follow Me
It would certainly be wonderful if we had a strong Cape Breton candidate. I think Houston has some key strengths that make him a much better candidate, however, I'm heavily influenced by his offer to double provincial Equalization funding, which would result in an additional $15 Million to the CBRM budget if he becomes Premier and follows through.

Facebook Comments

View all the LATEST
and HOTTEST posts
View

Share this comment by copying the direct link.

  • Our Sponsors

Using this website is subject to the Terms of Use that contain binding contractual terms.