Mr. Battiste states NSEF has not provided the proof to him...

Well, we watched the debate last night and we were upset by Jaime Battiste’s comments that the NSEF has never provided Mr. Battiste with the proof that the CBRM and rural Nova Scotia is suffering because of the lack of distribution of equalization in this province.

Mr. Battiste, we will provide that AGAIN for you today publicly. Because you choose to ignore the correspondence from the NSEF, that we constantly send you, is your problem not ours!

So again Mr. Battiste, here is what the constitution of Canada states in section 36.2 regarding equalization.

Equalization and Regional Disparities

Marginal note: Commitment to promote equal opportunities

• 36 (1) Without altering the legislative authority of Parliament or of the provincial legislatures, or the rights of any of them with respect to the exercise of their legislative authority, Parliament and the legislatures, together with the government of Canada and the provincial governments, are committed to

o (a) promoting equal opportunities for the well-being of Canadians;
o (b) furthering economic development to reduce disparity in opportunities; and
o (c) providing essential public services of reasonable quality to all Canadians.

• Marginal note: Commitment respecting public services
(2) Parliament and the government of Canada are committed to the principle of making equalization payments to ensure that provincial governments have sufficient revenues to provide reasonably comparable levels of public services at reasonably comparable levels of taxation.

Here is what section 52 of the same constitution states:

Primacy of Constitution of Canada

• 52 (1) The Constitution of Canada is the supreme law of Canada, and any law that is inconsistent with the provisions of the Constitution is, to the extent of the inconsistency, of no force or effect.

Now Mr. Battiste…..Let us compare the CBRM to the HRM on a few facts:

1. Unemployment Rates:

CBRM 14.2% (this number represents people who are currently receiving benefits)

HRM 7.5%
The unemployment rate in Halifax was 7.5% as of August 2021, down 1.2% from the previous month. The unemployment rate stood 4.4% below the peak from June 2020 but remains above the long-run average.

2. Residential Taxation Rates

CBRM - 2.26

HRM - 0.813
UPDATE: Council approved a residential tax rate reduction from 0.815 to 0.813, and a commercial tax rate reduction from 3.000 to 2.953.May 4, 2021

3. Commercial Taxation Rates

CBRM 5.627 (5.3 per CBRM)

HRM 2.953

4. Child Poverty Rates

CBRM 34.9%

HRM 20.4%
PROVINCE - The poverty rate among children aged 17 and under was 11.7% in Nova Scotia.Mar. 23, 2021
Child poverty rates are highest in Cape Breton (34.9%), Annapolis (34%), and Digby (33.1%). The lowest are in Antigonish (20.2%) and Halifax (20.4%).

Now Mr. Battiste. You want the proof….Read what the Liberal Provincial Finance Minister is stating in this article. A $230 million surplus in 2018 that came from equalization and every cent of that surplus was spent in downtown Halifax on luxury items for Halifax. A new museum and $110 million to the Halifax Convention Center.

When we first met with you, we saw the crocodile tears about the high child poverty rate is Eskasoni and we saw it again last night, but the poverty rate remains at 73.8% in your community.

Mr. Battiste, we are not sure what more proof you need from the NSEF. These are all government facts that are used or creditable news source data. Just because you refuse to read it does not mean you were not provided with these facts.

We would like to see if you will publicly answer to this report before election day on Monday. If you do not reply, then you are just showing the people of Cape Breton that you are choosing to ignore this issue, but we will not sit by and hear you tell the public that the NSEF has not provided you with the proof. Your ignorance about equalization is very concerning.



If anyone would like to watch the is the link:

Pictures and Documents

Posted by
Receive news by email and share your news and events for free on

2,295 2


Log In or Sign Up to add a comment.
Jonathan Pretty Follow Me
Vote him out!
Charles Sampson Follow Me
Nova Scotia Equalization Fairness When the NSEF first met with Battiste some time ago, he said he needed a short five-minute video that explained the Equalization issue. He said he needed it as people are too busy in Ottawa to spend a lot of time on such an issue. He was provided with that video. He has not said anything about whether he used it. When we recently met with Battiste, he provided us with a four-page legal explanation of the federal government's explanation of a legal argument to the Supreme Court of Canada for the price on carbon where it used the POGG power. Under this power, the onus was on the federal government to prove there is a national concern. Battiste then informs us we have to prove the Equalization, too, has such a national concern before it will be considered. This advice from Battiste is hogwash as the Equalization issue is already enshrined in the Constitution Act, 1982. When both he and Kelloway are following the government's orders to do absolutely nothing to address this constitutional injustice to rural Nova Scotians and the residents of the CBRM, re-electing them will only prolong this injustice.

Facebook Comments

View all the LATEST
and HOTTEST posts

Share this comment by copying the direct link.

  • Our Sponsors

Using this website is subject to the Terms of Use that contain binding contractual terms.