The NSEF Has Important Meeting With MP Mike Kelloway

The second political audit about equalization was conducted at Mike Kelloway's office yesterday. The board members of the NSEF voted on "Political Auditing" and all members agreed that this new form of advocacy on behalf of equalization fairness (or equalization unfairness in our case) is necessary to move forward.
We hope you can watch this important video as it was very productive with regards to the federal side of this issue.
This new form of advocacy will shed much light on the equalization issue and help identify the origins of the problem. We also hope you respect the work of both sides of this meeting, the participants and the discussion. We want highlight those politicians who meet with us and open the communication lines about this important federal transfer. Please continue to follow us as we change things up after many years.
Here is the audit video and there should be much discussion on this one:

Posted by
Receive news by email and share your news and events for free on goCapeBreton.com
SHOW ME HOW


441 1

1

Log In or Sign Up to add a comment.
Depth
Charles Sampson Follow Me
The mayor and council are letting the provincial government to accept these federal government equalization payments “unconditionally,” and the federal government states that the citizens of Nova Scotia have to hold the provincial government accountable. The federal government’s unconditional transfer is not legal as it is not stated in s.36 anywhere. The federal government is basing its unconditional transfer on claiming their opinion it is included in the wording of 36 (1) “Without altering the legislative authority of Parliament or of the provincial legislatures, or the rights of any of them with respect to the exercise of their legislative authority, Parliament and the legislatures, together with the government of Canada and the provincial governments are committed to a, b and c.” However, no such unconditional transfer is mentioned in the constitution. Legally, constitutionally how is it considered possible for a constitutional government just to make changes to the constitution which then results in both levels of government being able to ignore the constitution of Canada? Apparently, not only the N.S. Appeal Court thinks it can override the 1950 Supreme Court of Canada’s decision that the constitution does not belong to government, it belongs to the people.

Facebook Comments

View all the LATEST
and HOTTEST posts
View

Share this comment by copying the direct link.

  • Our Sponsors

Using this website is subject to the Terms of Use that contain binding contractual terms.