Where is Equalization Accountability by the Provincial Gov. ?

Government policy has become less of consultation and more of dictation. Do as we say! The following article was in the Cape Breton Post by Mayor Amanda MacDougall. We all remembered Tim Houston telling the CBRM that the grant will be doubled and then we had one year to renegotiate the new M.O.U. Now it seems that the CBRM and other rural communities will NOT be apart of the negotiations. The municipalities will have no say in how we are funded with our own money. If municipalities are children of the province, then we have an abusive parent. It is obvious that the messages of the NSEF group that questions the government about the one category in the equalization formula that is generated by a municipal deficiency in their tax capacity related to property taxes. That municipal tax capacity deficiency generates for the Province of Nova Scotia $560 million this year alone. The province is using $30 million to address the deficiency that the Federal government is sending approximately $560 million to address. The province is short by $530 million to the struggling municipalities. Tim Houston or Allan MacMaster has never responded to the NSEF when we ask these important questions. The mayor stated, “we can’t be an afterthought” and the mayor is correct in her comment and the municipalities will be an afterthought as we are excluded from these important negotiations. Now, how can we assist the municipality by showing the provincial government that this is not acceptable. All previous governments had done the same thing. It is time the public step up to the plate and demand answers as there is no accountability anymore by the provincial government. You can’t respond to the money interests but not respond to the general public. We are the residents of Nova Scotia Mr. Houston, and we are the ones who generate this equalization funding from Ottawa. It is time you start to realize that! Please reach out to the government with your concern. Remaining quiet is not working and when outside residents voiced their concerns about the extra taxation, it was quickly abolished. Don’t you think it is time to voice your concerns as the under-funded and unrepresented residents of Nova Scotia: [email protected] (Tim Houston) [email protected] (Allan MacMaster, Finance Minister) [email protected] (John Lohr, Municipal Affairs Minster) [email protected] Brian Comer, CB MLA PC) Here is the article: shown with Wayne MacDonald: “The municipalities weren’t included in the negotiations of this breakdown (of the municipal capacity grant),” McDougall said. SYDNEY — Mayor Amanda McDougall says she wants to meet with Premier Tim Houston to discuss another municipal financial capacity grant top-up, among other regional concerns. And if there is a chance the Cape Breton Regional Municipality could receive another top-up similar to one the provincial government rolled out last fall, McDougall said the decision shouldn't just come from the provincial government alone. McDougall told council during Tuesday night's meeting at city hall there needs to be an improvement in the working relationship between the province and municipalities, particularly when it comes to investing in communities that are looking to grow, such as the CBRM. “The municipalities weren't included in the negotiations of this breakdown (of the municipal capacity grant),” McDougall, who also serves as president of the Nova Scotia Federation of Municipalities, said after the meeting. “So NSFM stepped up as a board and said, ‘Hey, if you're not going to include us in a formal role in these negotiations, let us bring our administrators in. Let us bring in the people who know how this stuff works the best.'" Last fall, the Houston government allotted CBRM a $15-million top-up as part of an additional $32 million in equalization payments the province doled out to municipalities province-wide to help pay for crucial services. A DIALOGUE HAPPENING In a letter she recently sent off to Houston thanking him for last fall's commitment to double the municipal financial capacity grant, McDougall wrote that she wanted to get a dialogue happening between CBRM and the province to see how “your government can continue to invest in our community — the secondlargest municipality in the province. “There is a lack of clarity on the timeline for the MOU (memorandum of understanding) and municipal financial capacity grant negotiations and how that will impact the continued doubling of the current capacity grant,” she wrote. McDougall would like to see a meeting between CBRM and the premier take place to ensure there is good, solid communication with respect to what the municipality wants and to see where Houston and his government can meet those wants. ‘WE CAN’T BE AN AFTERTHOUGHT’ She cited good relations and conversations with John Lohr, the province's Municipal Affairs and Housing minister, as a starting point. But McDougall wondered whether a decade-old argument still exists about municipal governments being viewed like grassroots organizations with little impact on provincial decision-making. “We can't be an afterthought,” she said. “This impacts our day-to-day operations, how we plan for our future. If we're not at that table in the development of this (equalization) formula or service agreements, it's like we're not being respected.” In presenting her concerns, McDougall wasn't seeking any votes or motions from council, but more “support and advocacy to ensure our municipal voices are included in meaning conversation” prior to any provincial legislations made, she said. Along with a letter sent off to the premier regarding the municipal capacity grant, McDougall also sent one on the contentious non-resident provincial property taxes — a day before the premier announced the government will not go ahead with the two per cent property tax for or all non-residents who own residential property in Nova Scotia. ‘OUR GOVERNMENT LISTENED’ That scrapped tax may have largely came from an outpouring of dissent publicly, as District 1 Coun. Gordon MacDonald noted, “all the municipalities were giving (Minister Lohr) the gears over not … consulting with them over the property tax increase.” Once that tax increase was rescinded, “We saw our provincial government listen, respond and actually take back something that the community spoke out about,” McDougall said. The mayor said while she has yet to follow up on the two letters sent, both dated May 4 and sent the following day, she feels confident that conversations about greater input from the municipality will take place. “CBRM is going to have an opportunity to have our voices heard,” McDougall said.

Posted by
Receive news by email and share your news and events for free on goCapeBreton.com
SHOW ME HOW


531 4

4

Log In or Sign Up to add a comment.
Depth
Nova Scotians for Equalization Fairness My Post Follow Me
It is time we stop complaining to each other and start to complain to the elected officials directly. It is very simple....The Federal Government is sending $2.45 billion each year so we can live to a Canadian standard and not be overtaxed. Guess what folks....we are overtaxed and we do not live to a Canadian standard. People are losing homes because they can not afford their property taxes in the CBRM while we pay 3 times the property taxes as the HRM. Is that fair? Please reach out to the officials who obviously are looking after a select few in the HRM with funding that is sent so we can live like a Canadian. This government needs to be held accountable and that can only happen if you, the electorate, hold them to account. Are we the problem when we remain quiet on this serious issue? The taxpayers are the boss and the elected officials are public servants who are paid by YOU to represent YOU!
Charles Sampson Follow Me
The Equalization money comes entirely from the federal government. The provincial government is receiving this year alone $2.458 billion. The mayor - if she and the CBRM will be allowed to be involved in these provincial negotiations of the MOU - needs to question where just one of the five categories in the federal formula is spent in this province. This one category is generated by the provincial municipal deficiency in their tax capacity related to property taxes and miscellaneous revenues. That amount is over $560 million this year. Why is the provincial government providing only $30 million in its provincial equalization grant when the federal government is providing over $560 million? Accountability from our provincial government - according to the federal government - is the responsibility of the taxpayers in Nova Scotia. Isn't it about time for our citizens to question the provincial government on this very important financial matter that is having such an adverse impact on our ability to pay the high property taxes levied by our mayor and council? If the mayor is not included in these MOU discussions involving municipal funding, she will be just an "afterthought" (her word) to the provincial premier and his cabinet. Mayor McDougall must realize if the premier agrees to her involvement in whatever consultation he arranges, the final decision will not involve his government disclosing what happens to the one category that is generating over $560 for municipal financial sustainability. If this does happen, will Mayor McDougall continue to remain silent?
Michael Smith Follow Me
You should provide a few pre-written letters so you make it easy to send a letter to the government. There are even ways to setup a form so all the sender has to do is enter the name and email and it sends the letter out directly from the website. Make it easy and you will get a lot more people flooding the government indox’s
Nova Scotians for Equalization Fairness My Post Follow Me
Hi Michael. Great suggestion and we will do that going forward. We will provide a sample body of a response that the public can copy and paste into the email. Thanks for the awesome suggestion...\

Facebook Comments

View all the LATEST
and HOTTEST posts
View

Share this comment by copying the direct link.

  • Our Sponsors

Using this website is subject to the Terms of Use that contain binding contractual terms.