Who is Controlling the Fed. Equalization Program Mr. Kelloway?

It is important to hold politicians accountable if we want to see Cape Breton heal. Yesterday, this Letter to the Editor was published in the Cape Breton Post. Mike Kelloway seems to have a policy that any meetings with the NSEF are not to be recorded but here is what Mike Kelloway stated on Dec 10th ,2020: “The Nova Scotians for Equalization Fairness group (NSEF), your organization, has made a policy of recording all meeting with politicians and I respect that stance. I have made my own policy of not recording meetings” The NSEF has witnessed many meetings with constituents and stakeholders that are recorded on Mike Kelloways Facebook page. Here are some examples: https://www.facebook.com/CBPartnership/videos/134050582099810 https://www.facebook.com/mikekellowaymp/videos/1141809602949555 https://www.facebook.com/mikekellowaymp/videos/1084121055408961 And there are many more....So, it seems that Mike Kelloway has a policy of not recording anything that pertains to Equalization. Does this not alarm the voters? Mike Kelloway’s policy on recording is highly selective politically when he allows only those interviews that will advance his political career to be recorded. On issues which highlight his lack of political representation on behalf of his constituents, he forbids to have his words recorded. One such issue of vital importance is the issue of the Federal Equalization Transfer and Mike is being disingenuous here because the CBRM and Cape Breton is being seriously underfunded. Mike knows very well that the Federal Equalization transfer category related to a municipal deficiency in their tax capacity represents approx. 23% of each year’s total transfer. The latest transfer is $ 2.315 billion, and Mike knows that the Provincial grant of only $30 million to all of Nova Scotia, is grossly inadequate when the federal transfer is providing over $500 million for this category. Why is Mike Kelloway lying to his constituents? Why is Mike Kelloway not fighting for Cape Bretoners? Why is Mike Kelloway ignoring the constitutional commitment to Nova Scotians? Why is Mike Kelloway not doing his Job? Party politics is the reason! Here is Charles Sampson’s letter to the editor: Hi Mike Kelloway, What has been most disturbing is the disingenuous responses and the completely intentional misleading information by the federal government regarding its accountability for the federal Equalization program. The federal government’s role has been completely irresponsible and noncompliant constitutionally with the Constitution Act, 1982. As you are well aware, this federal program is completely 100 percent a federal program. It is paid for from federal taxes from all Canadian taxpayers. As you are well aware, too, the provinces could do absolutely nothing about the federal government’s cancellation of the scheduled 5-year 2018 discussion session regarding these federal Equalization transfers. The federal government simply told the provinces this was not going to happen until the year 2023. This control of the federal Equalization program was confirmed further by professor/economist Dr. Trevor Tombe, University of Calgary and research fellow at the School of Public Policy in a CBC news report. Dr. Tombe stated the Equalization program is a “100 percent federal program.” He also added further, “The provinces have no role in terms of the design and implementation of that program.” https://www.cbc.ca/.../jason-kenney-equalization-payments... Yet, responses from federal elected representatives state that the federal responsibility ends upon the transfers to the provinces. Pontius Pilate would appreciate such a betrayal! The federal government then adds that the citizens must hold the provincial governments accountable. This is completely dishonest on the part of the federal government and an impossible political task for the citizens, which the federal government intended when it transfers these Equalization transfers without conditions, which also totally ignores its constitutional commitment pursuant to s.36. The federal government knows fully-well these Equalization transfers have been and are still politically manipulated by every provincial government of Nova Scotia - even after this constitutional commitment was enshrined in the Constitution in 1982. The federal government knows these Equalization transfers are intentionally hidden-away from any accountability and transparency for the citizens of Nova Scotia, when every provincial government has deliberately placed these Equalization transfers in the General Revenues specifically to avoid any accountability to their citizens, Which all of the provincial governments have refused to produce any transparency to its citizens. Mike, you are fully-cognizant of these illegalities and have chosen to remain silent. That makes you as guilty of this crime against the citizens who have confided their trust in you to honestly represent their interest. You, to date, have not done so! What have you to say to the citizens of this community in response to these allegations against you? Yours truly, Charles W. Sampson Note. The Post changed a few items in the original letter but we posted here the actual letter that was sent into the Post. We will also send this letter to the Premier as well as Jaime Battiste.

Posted by
Receive news by email and share your news and events for free on goCapeBreton.com
SHOW ME HOW


20,690 20
https://capebreton.lokol.me/who-is-controlling-the-fed-equalization-program-mr-kelloway
Gov Political Commentary

20

Log In or Sign Up to add a comment.
Depth
Allie Macinnis Follow Me
You can send this great letter to any politician you want - it will get no response - our elected officials are tight lipped and follow party policies 😡
Lloyd Allan MacPherson Follow Me
“Politics will eventually be replaced by imagery. The politician will be only too happy to abdicate in favor of his image, because the image will be much more powerful than he could ever be”. – Marshall McLuhan
Charles Sampson Follow Me
Allie, since the CBRM council is not apparently pushing this issue, this becomes necessary just to show to the voters who need convincing that continuing to elect the same politicians who have done nothing is not a remedy to stop the downsizing of rural Nova Scotia and the CBRM. If the voters do not respond in their own interests, they are the problem too.
Lloyd Allan MacPherson Follow Me
Now Charles are you saying the voting public is a part of the problem; you’ll have a hard time convincing them of their guilt being that they are playing with limited responsibilities in this democracy. This is what the system is designed for. Didn’t they just spend decades voting in the same MPs? Could it be possible that you are addressing symptoms and still not the root cause?
Charles Sampson Follow Me
Over two decades is a long time of trying to convince this electorate, which continues to vote the same politicians in who have not done anything regarding this issue. The political system is manipulated and there is the vote that can be possibly used. The one avenue left still is to hopefully convince the public to vote to end this political manipulation of this one federal transfer.
Lloyd Allan MacPherson Follow Me
https://mcluhangalaxy.wordpress.com/2012/03/27/marshall-mcluhan-on-politician-image-projection/amp/
Nova Scotians for Equalization Fairness My Post Follow Me
It is time that Mike Kelloway came out from hiding. It is also time that Mike Kelloway be honest and sincere to the people who elected Mike. It is time for Mike Kelloway to seek the answers about where this money is being spent in the province. It would appear that Mike Kelloway is falling into the party lines that are responsible for almost destroying this community and island. Unless Mike Kelloway is willing to seek the answers his constituents want, he does not deserve to be re-elected. He has not earned his re-election thus far. We will protest Mike Kelloway come election time.
Charles Sampson Follow Me
Allie, the NSEF met with the CBRM council on February 23, 2021, and made a presentation on the Equalization issue. The NSEF provided the CBRM council with a number of questions that the governments will not answer. The NSEF requested the CBRM council as a stakeholderz in this Equalization issue to seek the answers from governments? The NSEF requested from the council to inform the public of the answers the council receives from the governments. After more than three months of time passing, I sent an email yesterday to find out what action the CBRM council have taken since the NSEF meeting
Lloyd Allan MacPherson Follow Me
Charles, you can’t continue to blame people who were working/exploited in a system that was designed to benefit those at the top. You can not hold past people responsible for the controls/indoctrination by politicians and those ruling through their governments which created the society in their design. What “benefit” were the working people generating or deciding for themselves? I guess you would regard a female slave who caught the eye of her male master for his own sexual gratification as being a part of the problem too?
Charles Sampson Follow Me
Lloyd, you are the one using my words to you from our previous discussion where you think all of the people are guilty, past and present, and responsible for wrongs of the past. I disagreed. You are the one who thinks there is a collective historical guilt for all for the past wrongs. In the case of this Equalization, however, the people who are continuing to vote against themselves are in the present. If they continue to vote against their own community, the problem lies within.
Martha Ross Follow Me
Thanks Charles, I certainly agree that the voters are a part of the problem, and they have been for a very long time. Voters continue to vote over and over again knowing darn well that they are going to to get the very same reaction once they are elected. I refuse to allow myself to support any of the same old parties that continue to not support the voters once elected. All these politicians are painted with the same brush, and it’s time all voters say no more voting until we have a democracy that supports the people instead of their so called leader, superior, dictator.
[comment deleted] Posted
Charles Sampson Follow Me
To date, COUNCILLOR GORDON MACDONALD, has responded to my email. He appreciated receiving this reminder as he considers the Equalization issue as one of his top issues to be resolved. As he stated, "This has been on my radar since your presentation on February 23/2021." He added the following, "My plan is to bring this request before council in the very near future as a motion to council to support the request NSEF made in the presentation to Council on February 23rd." Thanks to COUNCILLOR GORDON MACDONALD and MLA KENDRA COOMBES for following up on their commitment to represent their constituents by getting to the bottom of this Equalization issue regarding the manipulation of these yearly federal Equalization payments by all of the different political parties that formed the government of Nova Scotia.. All of the Nova Scotia provincial governments since the enshrinement of this federal government commitment in the Constitution Act, 1982 have manipulated these federal transfers, with the federal government playing a Pontius Pilate role that betrays the residents of rural Nova Scotia and of the CBRM. Why have only two elected representatives showed the political courage to have this government corruption opened up for the public to render its decision?
Parker Donham Follow Me
More of the familiar baloney from the Equalization Fairness crackpots. You know what's fair? Nova Scotia handles federal equalization payments exactly the way every other province does. That's eminently fair. In NS, as in every other recipient province, equalization revenue goes into general revenues, and then each department decides how and where it will spend its budgeted funds. No province in Canada allocates federal equalization revenue proportionally by region. Doing so would be nonsensical. It would be almost impossible to do any kind of audit to determine whether allocation of funds to different projects is geographically fair, because many expenditures have no geographical component. For example, the Atlantic provinces have only one children's hospital. No serious person thinks there should be a children's hospital in every population center. One is enough to serve the entire region efficiently. So is money spent on the IWK "Halifax money?" Try telling that to any Cape Breton or whose child has been saved from life-saving illness or injury by that hospital. If there is a specific area of provincial responsibility where you believe not enough money has been spent in Cape Breton, and keep writing is being unfairly deprived of its fair share, identify it and give details. But the preposterous claim that federal equalization revenue should be doled out to each county by population is simply nutty. Stop trying to generate hatred through false regional jealousies. If there's a problem, a specific problem with a specific department, identify it but please end this equalization hate mongering.
Charles Sampson Follow Me
Parker Donham, you have contributed more of your dribble to this discussion, which certainly is a far cry from your long-ago standard of being a responsible contributor concerned about informing the public of the government's behaviour that will "threatened to change the way democracy functions in Nova Scotia." Perhaps, you can recall your reporting in The Daily News, Sunday, May 8, 1994,"Blowing Off Steen." At the heart of this matter is the NSEF has not served up any "baloney" as you have stated, because the NSEF's so-called information is what the governments have provided on each of their websites and in correspondence. But the government in power refuses to answer questions pertaining to its own data. You have been told this before, but, for some reason, you continue to say the same nonsense again and again on social media. Perhaps you have become an old journalist gun-for-hire by the governing political party to assist the government in its refusal to be transparent about the distribution of these federal Equalization transfers within this province. Or has the number of views on this topic on this site raised concern among your political bosses? The few questions you have raised are questions you will have to direct to the government. The government controls the flow of information to the public, but when it is questioned on that flow - it refuses to answer. Why?
Parker Donham Follow Me
Charles, you seem to think that a personal attack is an adequate substitute for a rational response to a counter-argument. This makes me suspect you have no counter-argument to what I have written. So I repeat; every promise in Canada handles federal equalization revenue exactly The same way Nova Scotia does. They put it into general revenues, and then each department decides how and where to spend the money allocated to it in the provincial budget. No province doles out equalization revenue proportionally by region. You seem to think that Nova Scotia handling the money this way is some kind of evil plot. Does that mean every province in Canada is guilty of the same evil plot? I haven't attacked you personally, but I think you were a dead wrong on this topic. I would appreciate it if you could reply substantively, rather than substituting a personal attack for a rational argument. Why should Nova Scotia handle equalization revenue differently than all other provinces? Why should individual counties and municipalities be responsible for spending provincial revenue? No province does this, because it doesn't make any sense to do it that way.
Charles Sampson Follow Me
Parker, I was following your example of opening my response as you have done on each occasion. So, do I have your word you will not refer to members of the NSEF as "crackpots" etc. Or is the rule of your game, you are the only one permitted to fire your darts? So every province you state does exactly what is occurring in Nova Scotia. What is your evidence of what you are saying? You have provided nothing that supports what you have said. Has the NSEF stated the province should "doles out equalization revenue proportionally by region?" Where? As I recall, the NSEF is seeking an answer from the provincial government as to what happens to the significant percentage of the total Equalization transfer which is generated from the municipal deficiency in tax capacity related to property and miscellaneous revenues. You should remember I presented you with this information which was received from former finance minister Maureen MacDonald in a March 8, 2013 letter. At that time the percentage for that one category in the formula was 26.8% of the total transfer for that year. Parker, do you know what happens to this portion of the Equalization transfers each year. When MLA Kendra Coombes asked the same question of the municipal affairs minister, after five minutes he turned on his audio and he was unable to provide this information. Why? He told her to ask the finance minister, which she did and he could not answer it. Is the same kind of questioning going on in the other provinces? Can you explain why one of the ministers in control of these funds was unable to provide where such a large portion of the total Equalization every year is spent every year when five town have dissolved and other municipal units are considering the dissolution path? I have not question what happens in the other provinces given these funds are federally transferred unconditionally, and the government of this province does not respond to such questioning. Why?
Charles Sampson Follow Me
Parker, if every province is doing what is being done in Nova Scotia, how many municipal units have dissolved? What is the legal reference for the federal government to transfer these funds unconditionally?
Lloyd Allan MacPherson Follow Me
Yes, and just in time, here come Mr. Donham with his Newfoundland steak. You know what’s not fair - until recently, transparency wasn’t even a consideration for federal to provincial transfers to general revenue. That was until Covid restart funding was implemented. The premier at the time didn’t comply until COURAGEOUS journalists took him to task on the promise. Imagine the feds dictating that the province would have to SHOW the spending? The absolute gall. Well our region’s been on fire for decades despite the comments here from Mr. Donham who continues to deploy the “PULL YOURSELVES UP BY YOUR BOOTSTRAPS” commitment to emergency measures. No - you’ll need a flat bed donated, compressors, wiring harnesses, reliable treads - a whole lot of meet-in-the-middle initiatives to do anything really. Fluff? No, it’s not time for that. That “almost impossible audit”, let’s call it financial transparency, is all the NSEF has been asking for. What they have been able to explore is how in one year, near a quarter of a billion windfall happened in equalization - the same time child poverty rates began to soar in this province. So what is the issue - financial transparency - that would extinguish the fire. Nothing has to be built to ensure financial transparency - things have to be built to PREVENT this transparency and the province does a great job at keeping this injustice fortified. Mr. Donham, apparently not one to review this file fully and completely, (Kelloway and Battiste same students?) hasn’t clued in to the point the NSEF makes in reference to the one category (Mr Donham hasn’t ever shown that he grasps the various categories of this transfer). This one category related to property and miscellaneous revenues represents a calculated deficiency against us here which keeps our CBRM operating budget to the point where poverty is guaranteed for the region and reduced tax rates enjoyed in the HRM. Transparency now.
Parker Donham Follow Me
Mike Kelloway is100'% correct, and as usual on this topic, Fr. Al is pedaling discredited nonsense. There are two problems with Al's argument. – Equalization revenue goes into the province's general revenues, so it's impossible to track where it is spent. But the province spends all kinds on money in CB: On roads, schools, hospitals, parks, libraries, and all the normal things that provinces spend on. – No province in Canada handles equalization revenue the way Al wants Nova Scotia to handle it. No province divides it up and sends it to municipalities IN proportion to their population. Ottawa provides equalization to less affluent provinces as a way to ensure they can provide programs in health & education that meet a basic national standard. You can argue that Nova Scotia doesn't receive enough equalization. You can argue that certain provincial programs are underfunded in Cape Breton. But that would require research into the amount spent by individual departments here and elsewhere. The idea that the province should take equalization money revenue from Ottawa and hand it off to municipalities is frankly ludicrous, as is the entire campaign by the equalization "fairness" crusaders. No province handles equalization revenue in this way. None. Nada. It's a fantasy that serves only to exploit ignorance and promote resentment.
Charles Sampson Follow Me
Kelloway sent his reply to you? Lol Parker, strange how you and the government use similar arguments to claim Fr. Maroun has made the arguments you state, Fr. Maroun’s argument is to find out why the rural areas of N.S. and the CBRM are financially struggling to survive. Why have five towns dissolved? Why are many other municipal units considering dissolution? Why are these municipal units financially struggling when the federal government provides the money for their deficiency in tax capacity related to property and miscellaneous revenues? This year alone, this municipal deficiency generated over $525 million to this province. So Parker, explain why rural areas and the CBRM have to dissolve or financially struggle? And, why is the government refusing to publicly show exactly how it has spent these Equalization payments? Why does the federal government provide these funds unconditionally, but cannot cite any constitutional reference to do it? Isn’t it Fr. Maroun’s right or yours to expect government to abide by the laws it enshrines in OUR constitution, which is to ensure all citizens can seek the protection they are entitles to? Why is the government refusing to answer these questions? Why has the federal government washing its hands of its responsibility to ensure its compliance with its constitutional obligation under s.36? After all, it is a 100% federal program, in terms of its design and implementation? And, Justice MacDonald’s conclusion in his N.S. Appeal Court over ruled a previous 1950 SCOC ruling which stated the constitution does Not belong to a parliament or to any of the Legislatures, it belongs to the country. So Parker, Fr. Maroun is guilty of having government comply with the law, which includes being transparent and accountable for its actions.
seek-warrow-w
  • 1
arrow-eseek-e1 - 10 of 10 items

Facebook Comments

View all the LATEST
and HOTTEST posts
View

Share this comment by copying the direct link.

  • Our Sponsors

Using this website is subject to the Terms of Use that contain binding contractual terms.