Why The New Federal Jobs Aren't All They're Cracked Up To Be

Like many of you, on Thanksgiving Day, I read an article that told how Mark Eyking and Rodger Cuzner would be in New Waterford the next day to make a federal jobs announcement. While I fully admit to not being the biggest fan of either of them, I was cautiously optimistic. Federal government jobs in New Waterford certainly wouldn’t be a bad thing, and it was about time these guys delivered something of value to Cape Bretoners. I wondered which department these jobs would be connected to. I knew we already had federal jobs connected to Immigration, Refugees, and Citizenship, the Canada Revenue Agency, Veterans Affairs, and Service Canada. Surely it wouldn’t be additional jobs in any of those departments. I also wondered how many jobs there would be. With an unemployment rate as high as ours (14.5 %), the more jobs, the better.

When the announcement finally came on Tuesday, however, I couldn’t help but be disappointed. Don’t get me wrong, these are good paying jobs with benefits, which Mark Eyking was quick to remind us of. There are also 44 of them, which is more than I had expected. Still, there were a few reasons why I was disappointed.

The new jobs in New Waterford are payroll support jobs for the troubled Phoenix pay system. If you are unaware, the federal government implemented the Phoenix system in early 2016 despite warnings from workers that it was unreliable. Since that time, there have been over 200,000 cases of federal employees being paid improperly or not receiving the benefits they are entitled to. The pay system has been such a disaster that the federal government announced earlier this year that it will be scrapping the program in favour of a better system.

Remembering that announcement, I immediately questioned how long these jobs will remain in New Waterford. If the system they are supporting is being scrapped, then what happens to the jobs once Phoenix is gone? Poring through the announcement, I saw that these jobs were good for a two-year term. While I was happy that these workers will be secure for two years, I was also a little angry that Phoenix is going to continue for that much longer. Why are the feds pouring millions of dollars into a system that they know doesn’t work and that they believe can’t be fixed? While it is great to have 44 more people employed in Cape Breton, it’s not so great to have tens of thousands of workers here and elsewhere across the country dealing with issues of being paid too little or not being at all in some cases.

That two-year term also got me thinking about something else. We have an election coming up in 2019. These jobs will be good until 2020. Call me a cynic, but what are the chances that these jobs are just part of a money drop leading up to the election and will disappear soon afterwards? Are the jobs simply a ploy to keep Mark and Rodger in their seats in the House? Not that either of them have much to worry about anyway; as if Cape Bretoners would consider electing anybody other than a Liberal despite the fact that that they have done virtually nothing for us. Our unemployment rate has remained virtually unchanged during the past 18 years and our population has been in a steady decline. But Cape Bretoners will continue to vote Liberal because that’s what they do. So maybe these jobs are more like a scrap thrown under the table by Justin Trudeau to the dogs who are loyal but who will never get to sit at the table.

The other things about the jobs announcement that slightly troubled me was that the jobs were never posted publicly. They were filled in consultation with CBU, NSCC, and CBBC. Don’t get me wrong, I think that it’s great that these college and university graduates will have work in the local area for the next two years. I have to ask, though, what about all those other people who have been looking for work? Shouldn’t they have at least had the opportunity to apply? Eyking and Cuzner are selling this as 44 new jobs for New Waterford. The reality is that few, if any, of the workers will be from New Waterford. Should they choose to buy lunch there or gas up their cars there, then they will be making a small contribution to the community’s economy. Otherwise, these jobs might just as well be located somewhere else.

Far be it from me to look a gift horse in the mouth; these jobs are certainly welcome. But we would do well to see them for what they are, namely short-term employment for 44 college graduates, a small boost for New Waterford’s economy, and most importantly a bribe or a reward (depending on how you choose to look at it).

Posted by
Receive news by email and share your news and events for free on goCapeBreton.com
SHOW ME HOW


3,481 19
https://capebreton.lokol.me/why-the-new-federal-jobs-arent-all-theyre-cracked-up-to-be
Gov Government News Federal Government

19

Log In or Sign Up to add a comment.
Depth
Joe Ward Follow Me
Even fixed-term jobs are good news for Cape Breton, but this was certainly a political booster announcement. The host introduced each of the MPs by seemingly reading their entire curriculum vitae before announcing jobs that were already filled.
Kel donovan Follow Me
Exactly Chris!Another liberal carrot that will rot and fall as soon as the nx election takes place!These two are long in the tooth.Please vote for anyone but eb and seb nx election.
Good Job Chris. How very true. Announce 44 new jobs that are not open to everyone in the community is a slap in the face. We need industry development and not temporary jobs. These 2 MP's must go in the next election. What have they done for Cape Breton besides cash their pay checks.? The NSEF will be advising the residents byway of our call center about other options available next year. Hopefully the CBU party is almost ready to announce some candidates and maybe some independents will consider running as well. I think everyone in government thought that the NSEF would be gone away by now but we are growing stronger and stronger every day. We will protest during the Federal Election and bring light to the poor representation we have here on Cape Breton Island from these two Liberal MP's. Washing your hands of the situation that sees the Nova Scotia Provincial Government stealing funding that is provided directly for us in Cape Breton should be reason enough to not vote for either of them. Cape Breton must send a loud clear message to Ottawa next year and see 2 new MP's elected. Then the same practice must take place a year later for the Provincial Election. All politicians should be aware that Cape Breton is waking up as of recent and people are taking stock of their elected representation. It will be interesting to see how many of them will take part in the new public debates that will take place when the CBU Party is ready in the near future. Remember everyone, if your MLA or MP does not show up and debate Cape Breton's future, they are not worthy of your vote. Cape Breton must heal and soon and every person on this Island has the power to make positive change. Together, we will........ The NSEF
Joe Ward Follow Me
I think it's an excellent precedent for the NSEF to use its tremendous community support to call a spade a spade when it comes to political representatives who should not be elected/re-elected. Would the NSEF agree that Cecil Clarke, who works against Equalization and is advocating for abolishing the provincial transfer, should (a) not be re-elected to any political role where he may have an impact on Cape Breton, including the PC leadership?
Hi Joe. The NSEF will challenge any politician at any level of government about Equalization. Cecil is no different. The difference is that when dealing with the current political parties (Liberal, PC's & NDP's) they have all screwed us in Cape Breton and screwed us badly. Cecil keeps saying he is looking for answers and solutions but the simple fact is that the answer and solution is already in place. It is called "Equalization" and any politician who thinks that they can manipulate it for any purpose is WRONG and we will call them on it. New blood is needed right across the board. I can see how some view the NSEF as not challenging politics at a municipal level but our fight is much higher than that. Provincial and Federal governments are not easy to deal with at all and actually consume us. If the next premier of this province does anything differently with regards to looking after big business in HRM and allowing the puppet strings to be pulled in every direction, I will be shocked. Time will tell. Thanks Joe.
Joe Ward Follow Me
It's obvious that among all candidates for PC leadership, Cecil Clarke has a history of opposition to Equalization (having battled and mocked Mayor John Morgan), and is currently advocating for abolishing the provincial transfer. We know a few things. Of the candidates, Houston is the only one that had advanced Equalization in any way. He's pledged to double it. And while that is not the full ask of the NSEF, it still needs to be recognized as, to date, the best forward motion from any of the PC leadership candidates. We also know that the Liberals continue to be vulnerable to a rising PC party. We cannot be certain if he would follow through if he became Premier. However, of all the choices, it's only rational that we prefer the candidate most likely to move Equalization in the right direction. Right now, PC members are voting by mail-in ballot, or by planning to attend the convention. I challenge the NSEF to call upon its members and supports to: Ask that they not support Cecil Clarke as the PC leader since he always has and continues to oppose and work against Equalization fairness in Cape Breton. With peak interest in Equalization here, it's quite a missed opportunity if all the attention and energy isn't channelled into making a political impact... that has a direct relationship with either advancing or hurting the Equalization cause. The clear reality is: If Cecil Clarke were to become PC leader and then Premier of Nova Scotia, Equalization will take a huge blow and massive set back to its efforts. The time is now. Once he's in place, hindsight becomes 20/20, bringing into clear focus our missed opportunities. The NSEF just called for MPs Eyking and Cuzner not to be re-elected. Where is the call against the #1 adversary of Equalization: Cecil P. Clarke?
Bill Fiander Follow Me
It does make sense in what you're saying if promises made by politicians would be realized once elected. The liberals did the same sort of thing in the last election by indicating an audit would be carried out. But once in power, did not do one. So it is difficult to make a decision of one over another, even if one of them has been negative regarding equalization, and the other has made a 15 million promise. The latter may be a legit promise or perhaps he's just smart enough not to go negative on this subject. Politicians are the least trusted for a reason. I wish that wasn't the case.
Charles Sampson Follow Me
Should all the stars align and Houston is able to provide this $15 million, does anyone really think there would be any further acknowledgement of how much the Equalization under funding really is? Isn’t this comparable to the 44-jobs Liberal election bait?
Joe Ward Follow Me
If you think you have better odds with the candidate who (i) wants to give our ~$15 Million in transfer back to the control of the province - Clarke, than the candidate who (ii) wants to give us an additional ~$15 Million - Houston, then make your bet.
Joe Ward Follow Me
Strategy involves making choices and attempting to predict likely outcomes. All things being equal: 1. It's very unlikely Clarke will reverse a decade of opposition to Equalization fairness. He's a major risk factor to take the top position in the province. He will absolutely work against the NSEF as both PC leader and/or Premier. (although his desperate campaign email today seems to indicate his team knows he's losing) 2. Given an equal likelihood of follow through on a campaign by any candidate, those who (i) support some forward progress on a given issue, are less of a risk than those who (ii) oppose the same issue. If the NSEF lets Clarke sail on through without exerting their influence strategically, they're just unloading a trojan horse, fully aware of what's inside, but convincing themselves they'll deal with it later.
Charles Sampson Follow Me
It is obvious Joe you have put all your support to Houston’s promise. It is also clear Clarke has opposed fair Equalization for municipalities. You have made that clear. However, you avoid commenting that if the stars are all aligned for Houston’s promise of $15 million for the CBRM, that any further government discussion of the extent of the provincial government under funding will be ended. The public should realize Houston’s promise and the federal Liberal announcement of 44 jobs for two possible years is to secure votes and not to address this community’s many years of serious under funding.
Joe Ward Follow Me
You're not thinking of making strategic selections in terms of probability of a particular outcome. What's the most likely thing to happen? And what's the more valuable outcome for you? You tell me you want $10, and I tell you I'll give you either $0 or $5, are you really going to pick $0? If you had only two choices among the following, you can't seem to decide which would be more advantageous? Houston: Double equalization, providing approx. $15 Million more to the CBRM, and review it in year 1 as Premier. More. Clarke: Abolish equalization, send approx. $15 Million in current provincial transfer back to provincial control. Less. You don't have to vote to support either one of them when the provincial election happens. But... despite whoever you vote for... if a majority of Nova Scotians do vote Conservative and they do form the government, which do you think is more helpful, and which is less harmful to the fight for Equalization? You think risking letting Clarke become Premier - when he's telling you that you're not getting anything with Equalization and he's talking millions back - is less risky than putting the one in place who says he'll increase it? You'd rather have someone who is a firm and consistent "No", as opposed to the one that's *starting* to make concessions?
Charles Sampson Follow Me
Joe, you can fill as much space as you wish with the same message again and again to convince yourself. You haven’t dealt with what I wrote.
Joe Ward Follow Me
I'm not going to break through the resistance with you, Charles. But I'm pretty sure, most people don't think like you on this matter. You have some other bone to pick that is clouding your judgement and amplifying your stubbornness. Whether you think you're picking the *better of two options* or the *lesser of two evils*, it just makes sense to pick the one that is likely to be the most valuable and the least damaging. Why leave your fate up to chance? What a waste of the NSEF's tremendous influence that would be.
Charles Sampson Follow Me
Joe, that description equally describes you. You avoid my comment that there are these two announcements whose objective in both instances is to get votes. You continue to avoid my comment that IF the Houston camp does win the Tory leadership and later government and is able to provide this $15 million (which will be lowered by $3+ million clawback), that no further acknowledgement of the real underfunding will be done by any government. Are you claiming that is not a concern? As for your comment, “Why leave your fate up to chance?”, you are guilty of that same accusation. So far, all your promotion of Houston is still dependent on “if.” NSEF’s “tremendous influence” you refer to could be wasted with a Houston winning the Tory leadership and later the government and providing the $15 million with clawback, which closes out any further consideration of the real amount of municipal under funding.
Joe Ward Follow Me
"If" acknowledges that it's a pledge only. I have an expectation of follow through. Confirmation is impossible until we get there. He also pledges a review. If you're predicting any government will be reluctant to turn over $250 Million, you're absolutely right. It's a no brainer. But you can still be just as stubborn and keep fighting for more after we get that extra $15 Million. My goal is to gain something, not keep the problem in place so I can groan about unfairness for the rest of my life.
Charles Sampson Follow Me
It is a promise from a politician UNTIL... A so-called review is supposedly going on now. You always quote the maximum $250 million the 26% represents that is provided by the federal government for the deficiency if tax capacity related to property as being an impossibility, so you jump for the first promise of $15 million because something is better than nothing. Do you really believe seriously that any further discussions will be undertakes after that? Had the municipalities been receiving their federally provided Equalization from day one, it is likely we would not be eligible today. That would result in the federal transfer being much smaller today. Since it is being used by the government to promote the Capital Region all these years, the provincial agenda is dependent on these transfers and to expect any additional funding beyond this promised $15 million is also a no brainer.
Joe Ward Follow Me
Charles, I appreciate your expertise and focus on the *problem*. Since we're not adding value to the discussion, I'm going to opt out from further redundant comments.
Charles Sampson Follow Me
It should be obvious to Cape Bretoners that the two-year 44 jobs announcement is nothing more than a federal Liberal Party election bait offer for our job-starved community. When over the past 20-years, our two federal “representatives” have sat silently while this community saw its portion of the 26% of the total Equalization Payments or $4 billion used to promote the Capital Region, we are now supppose to jump with joy for about $5 million over two years. Really! Remember, these two have received their very high basic salaries (that is $170,000 plus per year now) over this period and in addition to that the taxpayers too will pay for their unearned retirement pensions of about $129,000 per year. So, they have surely looked out for themselves, but not their constituents’ economic future. You can rest assured these two will not need the services of a food bank at any time. It is time this community looked out for its economic future BEFORE it is too late. And as NSEF has clearly stated this starts with electing representatives who WILL provide the kind of political representation this island deserves and needs in next year’s federal election. Unless the public supports new candidates who run specifically to provide the kind of representation we badly need, we will have nobody to blame but ourselves.

Facebook Comments

View all the LATEST
and HOTTEST posts
View

Share this comment by copying the direct link.

  • Our Sponsors

Using this website is subject to the Terms of Use that contain binding contractual terms.