A Guy Named Geoff Could Stop Mayor Clarke from Bungling Port Dev

A Guy Named Geoff MacLellan Could Stop Mayor Clarke from Bungling the Sydney Port Development

  

Tl;dr I’m going to propose a way for MLA Geoff MacLellan to help salvage the potential for Sydney’s port development. It involves him breaking through all the secrecy and mismanagement of Mayor Cecil Clarke.

If there was ever a guy that desperately needed a relief pitcher, it’s Mayor Cecil Clarke. Touched up... and down by 10 runs in the 7th inning… but still clinging to the ball. He’s walked the bases loaded, pitched underspeed meatballs right into the sweet spot of the opponents bats, and all the while still manages to flash a wink at the media photographers.

In any other baseball diamond, that guy would be pulled from the game (possibly by an ear). But you see, Clarke isn’t just the starting pitcher with an unimpressive record. He’s also the team manager. And just about everyone in Cape Breton - except maybe Councillor Kevin Saccary - can easily see how that would lead to problems.

But hey… so what if you’re losing, as long as you still get your picture in the papers?

It really comes down to whether your goal is to win the game for your entire team and every baseball fan - or a more self-centered goal of fulfilling your need to be acknowledged standing on the mound.

Fortunately, for those of us who are good sportsmen and women, there may be a way to reestablish the integrity of the game.

Be it resolved, if there was ever a town that consistently produces guys and gals that know how to play ball, it’s Glace Bay. That’s both on the actual baseball diamond, and apparently in the political arena too.

Now just in case I got carried away with that elongated baseball analogy, just a quick heads up that we’re talking Cape Breton politics here.

And that relief pitcher warming up the arm is none other than top Glace Bay talent: our Nova Scotia Liberal MLA, and Minister of Transportation and Infrastructure Renewal, Geoff MacLellan.

The man may not be able to work miracles. At this stage it might be a bit of a mop up job. But it’ll be a tremendous impact on morale heading into a possible game two, three, or four... if we can hang in there. The late game rescue is still worth a shot.

Why is Geoff MacLellan in our Bullpen?

There are two reasons I’m talking about Minister MacLellan. Firstly, there are a couple of very important things he has already done. And, secondly, there’s a vitally important thing he could still do for the taxpayers of the CBRM, our entire island, and our province.

First, let’s start with an important video clip from CTV News. Geoff is shown speaking to CCCC (Quad C) representatives with HPDP’s Albert Barbusci, and Port of Sydney Development Corporation GM, Paul Carrigan by his side. It’s on the day of the port corp’s first controversial AGM (annual general meeting). Watch the 10 second clip below.

“We understand there’s a profit model there. Sydney wants to be a part of that, and Cape Breton wants to be a part of that. And we’ll do whatever we can to help. The doors are open and we’re looking to provide this opportunity…” - Minister Geoff MacLellan to CCCC Representatives

If it first it seems too simple in concept to be that important, take note of the following:

 

  • Mayor Clarke handed over a liquidated Archibald’s wharf to CME (who certainly doesn’t appear to have met their obligations for investment so far),

  • bought land from a connected local business interest for a million to then lease it back to another, and

  • handed out “port marketing” exclusivity to the HPDP partners without ever having established

  • (a) what port dev qualifications they actually have, or

  • (b) how (or if) they actually spent the million or so used to try to justify the that agreement to the public.

So when Geoff MacLellan immediately takes his first opportunity with CCCC to emphasize that Sydney and Cape Breton at large want to share in the profits, he sets the tone we need right at the outset.

That’s what a closer does.

MacLellan Takes the First Tangible Step in Buying Time with the Rail Line

Genesee & Wyoming, the rail line owners, say they are ready to pull up the tracks. They’ve discontinued service on the Cape Breton part of the line. And they were ready to apply for abandonment. Whether or not it was just an attempt to create a sense of urgency, the political buzz was that they planned to salvage it for scrap value of the rails.

The minister bought some time by putting the kibosh on immediate or accelerated abandonment.

The new regulations MacLellan announced require the company to offer the rail line for sale privately first. If no offers happen in 30 days, then the province has an opportunity to step in. On top of that, they’d have to provide specific information about the salvage value, costs of removal, remediation, and environmental considerations.

So Geoff just did about as much as he could do, when it comes to the rail line, to stall that process out a little bit.

But he is at a tremendous disadvantage in doing his job. And if Cape Breton and the Port of Sydney Development Corporation expect him to be effective, he’s going to need full access to everything.

As promised, I owe you a strategy that will position Geoff MacLellan to mop up the damages a little and maybe even turn things around for port development.

MLA Geoff MacLellan Needs to Join the Board of the Port of Sydney Development Corporation

If you just read that headline and you’re not a fan of my Cape Breton political commentary, you’re probably ready to jump me right about now.

Hypocritical perhaps? Afterall, I just finished writing a few different topics that emphasized how irresponsible the mayor is for staying on the board. I reminded you that he and other councillors are not qualified and not really authorized to continue being on the Port of Sydney Development Corporation board. 

And now I’m going to tell you it again for good measure. Read the highlights from the port corporation articles:

So have I actually done an about face? Not at all. Here’s why.

Article 5.02 would prevent MLA Geoff MacLellan from being on the board, as it does the mayor and our councillors. That’s because they are all elected officials. And it expressly notes (see above) in the articles that they are not eligible to serve on the board.

But...

If Mayor Cecil Clarke Can Twist Section 5.02 to Stay On the Board, So Can Minister Geoff MacLellan

And I’m not in favor of either of them being on that board. Here is the difference.

If Geoff is going to be in the position to keep the province active, involved, and supportive in the port development, he needs access to every bit of information that Cecil Clarke and friends have.

He can find out what is really going on inside those meetings and discourage nonsense like planning retreats for themselves. And he can get to know more about the relationship and background of the Harbor Port Development Partners (HPDP).

But ultimately beyond getting access to all that information, he has one primary focus in joining the board.

And that is to leave it and take Mayor Cecil Clarke and the councillors with him. He would be expected to take a proactive role in insisting that the board follow section 5.02 and expedite recruiting a qualified board.

The articles state that there is a very particular cross section of expertise that must be represented by the board members. Right now, they don’t have it. It’s dominated by the one role it isn’t supposed to have: elected officials.

And Cecil Clarke Cannot Say “No”

He can’t say “no” because it would be shooting the port development effort in the foot. How do you justify not allowing a key provincial representative to have oversight?

And he can’t say “no” because of Section 5.02 - restricting elected officials from being on the board - because he and the other councillors are in violation themselves.

What’s good for goose is good for the gander.

So it’s time for Cecil to relax his grip on that baseball. And call in a relief pitcher that can help get the job done.

Our MLA reliever can’t catch the corner with a perfect slider if he’s blindfolded. Let’s get a guy named Geoff full access. And for Cecil's remaining time as mayor, let's make sure he's making the right friends on behalf of Cape Breton.

If you support Geoff MacLellan joining the Port of Sydney Development Corporation Board, let him know via email at [email protected], or tweet this article to him on Twitter at @GeoffMacLellan.

  

Don’t forget to share it to your Facebook and Twitter if you think this strategy may help move the port development project forward with better provincial oversight and assistance.

Posted by
Receive news by email and share your news and events for free on goCapeBreton.com
SHOW ME HOW


3,356 15
https://capebreton.lokol.me/a-guy-named-geoff-could-stop-mayor-clarke-from-bungling-port-dev
I’m going to propose a way for MLA Geoff MacLellan to help salvage the potential for Sydney’s port development - and Mayor Cecil Clarke can't say "No".
Gov Election Past Elections Election News & Issues Gov Political Commentary

15

Log In or Sign Up to add a comment.
Depth
madeline yakimchuk Follow Me
who exactly would have the authority to put Geoff MacLellan on the board? If authority is as clear as the rest of the board operations, who would have the capacity to get it done anyway?
Joe Ward My Post Follow Me
I suppose the board could do it themselves by vote (TBD). I don't think they consulted CBRM council to form the original (supposedly interim) board (?), therefore, it would not require council's approval the way they are operating now. However, it would be a good gesture to put it before council and let them give their input. If they objected, they would certainly need to explain why.
madeline yakimchuk Follow Me
so, it would be a smart idea to get "someone" at council to actually propose it, get it on the agenda, and get some public there to witness it. It is not likely that anyone from within the board would actually move this independently. It is also a good idea to check with Geoff, of course, but someone with authority to at least move it had to be convinced too.
Joe Ward My Post Follow Me
Good point. I certainly see no reason that any of the councillors could not bring it up for discussion - or the mayor if he was wise. We know, at the very least, that Councillor Ray Paruch is not pleased with the continuance of the mayor and a selected few councillors remaining on the board, and thereby violating the Port of Sydney Corp corporate articles in so doing. There are likely a few others.
madeline yakimchuk Follow Me
well, it might be a very good idea Jeff, but very good ideas need action. I strongly recommend that you contact Eldon or Paruch and ask them to do it.
madeline yakimchuk Follow Me
that would move you from being an armchair activist to an actual activist!... on this point... I don't know that you are not an actual activist on other matters.
Joe Ward My Post Follow Me
Ha, ha. I've certainly never considered myself an activist, although I am concerned with matters of community, governance, big business, and particularly issues related to "fairness" for the average family. I don't like the little guys getting walked on. However, I also think of my approach to participation as a strategist, not an activist. In its simplest form, that means I simply make an effort to share my ideas thoughtfully, with consideration of who my audience is likely to be, and with some form of constructive suggestion included. In a more complex format, that means some defined objectives, a pathway to get there, and whatever marketing and PR capabilities I can muster. I'm personally not crazy about the term "armchair activist" as it's somewhat of a diminishing term, similar to how the mayor has branded and positioned his critics as those in the "cheap seats". I believe in objectivity and that all feedback has value to it. There's just a wide range in terms of signal to noise. At the lowest level, angry or vulgar stuff like that of the rant rooms, you really have to carve away at to get to a useful idea. At the highest levels, a well articulated and supported argument. However, if I was to attempt give a personal definition to "armchair activist", I might say that is a person who is reactive, doesn't stay focused on a particular issue for very long, and is drawn more to the personal importance of being involved in something, rather than the "something" itself and the potential for better outcomes. Bruce Lee talked about the man who practised one kick 10,000 times versus the man who practiced 10,000 kicks, one time each. If we think of it as focus, then I prefer staying within the scope of my role. And I think that is thoughtful communications. Of course, I also do reach out to politicians or key stakeholders when it's appropriate, and with the right timing. I do have some media and political contacts that I touch base with.
madeline yakimchuk Follow Me
An activist is not just someone who bares their breasts on the street and writes slogans across their body (to be extreme for contrast). An activist is someone who takes action. It could be argued that by writing you are taking action, but I say, if you have a good idea like this, contacting Geoff directly and asking what he thinks, and finding someone on the council who would make a motion is more effective action. Good ideas don't get things done.
Joe Ward My Post Follow Me
Agree. This is the idea germination phase. Then you pick up a bit of momentum and run the view count up. That shows that the topic has wider interest before we go knocking. We have to choose our requests and our timing carefully. But in a few days, I'll make some strategic contacts. Note: I tweeted to Geoff MacLellan and Derek Mombo about the impending article coming on goCB before publishing.
madeline yakimchuk Follow Me
by the way that JEFF was a sort of typo... I certainly know your name! I type really really fast and I learned before spellcheck.
Jim Murphy Follow Me
I am impressed when people like you Joe put this much effort into an article. The message needs to spread further than this website though. I agree with Madeline that contact with politicians, whether you like them or not, is important. They garner media attention merely by opening their mouth and they also need the public to like them. Everyone knows coackroaches scatter when the light comes on, time to start flicking switches I say.
Joe Ward My Post Follow Me
I've found that goCapeBreton has a surprisingly large reach. Not only in terms of the view counts for various topics, but also how it has directly helped support - and has influenced - mainstream media coverage. It only takes one journalist to pick up an idea that influences their future coverage - and value is achieved. You could give a rough rule of thumb such as 10/10: 10% of the views may be someone with moderate to significant interest in the topic. And 10% of that sub-group may actually share or use that information elsewhere. This topic will likely break 1,000 views. We can estimate that 100 people will have some level of interest and leave with some ideas. And perhaps 10 of them may be either stakeholders, interact with stakeholders, or are media reps and may utilize aspects in their future work. Of course, that doesn't apply to this topic alone. It applies to anything *shared*, anywhere, in any format. Results vary. Sharing our thoughts and ideas are key. Nobody hears what we're "thinking" regardless of what the folks at the psychic conventions would try to have us believe for $10 bucks. ;) So I'd just emphasize that something thoughtfully expressed here, that gets a few hundred or a few thousand views, certainly has a chance to perpetuate. :)
madeline yakimchuk Follow Me
I'd like to know more about the reach, although I think it is good to keep that private for a while. In the topics I follow it does seem to be a handful of us who participate, but reach is another thing, for sure.
Joe Ward My Post Follow Me
Engagement at a topic level is great. Influence at an issue level is the ultimate objective. And I'm certain that is already happening. In social media, readership will always be significantly greater than the smaller niche of people who will comment. It happens with mainstream media as well (newspaper comments to the editor or online story comments, radio call ins, etc). At an absolute minimum, conversations here are being used as research materials for the media.
Joe Ward My Post Follow Me
P.S. I also utilize this tool called "SocialResponseApp" to promote via Twitter. It's a software as a service application I developed. If you follow me on Twitter at @joewardpr, you will see that all topics shared here also are perpetually scheduled for promotion on Twitter too. This article will run with priority for the next few weeks. :) https://capebreton.lokol.me/video-call-for-cape-breton-testers---socialresponseappcom

Facebook Comments

View all the LATEST
and HOTTEST posts
View

Share this comment by copying the direct link.

  • Our Sponsors

Using this website is subject to the Terms of Use that contain binding contractual terms.