Father Maroun Still Ignored By Those Running In Federal Election

The following letter was published today. Father Maroun is concerned with the fact that politicians running in the federal election from Cape Breton, continue to ignore the equalization issue and are ignoring our constitutional rights under section 36. We have a right to like the rest of Canada without excessive taxation. Here is the letter: The residents of the CBRM have a right to know the truth and I have an obligation to the public to state it here. I have emailed MP candidates Mike Kelloway, Jaime Battiste, Allan MacMaster and Anna Manley to discuss the biggest problem facing Cape Breton. All have ignored that email. The lack of equalization flowing to this municipality is a major problem and the fact that the politicians just ignore it means that much-needed changes won’t result. The Constitution of Canada is clear on equalization. Every year the transfer grows to Nova Scotia by hundreds of millions of dollars and yet the Cape Breton Regional Municipality (CBRM) still gets only $15 million and pays back $22 million. Equalization is 100 per cent a federal program and uses federal taxes to fund the transfers to receiving provinces. All one must do is travel to Halifax to see where the transfer to Nova Scotia is spent. If your candidates ignore this major problem, then they are causing the problem in my opinion. I have been trying to secure a meeting in Ottawa for over 30 years to discuss our rights to live equally in Canada without excessive taxation, but ignoring the topic has worked wonderfully for the political parties who continue to manipulate funding that is sent for a specific reason. CBRM council, local MPs and MLAs are not holding the parties accountable, and voters are also not holding them accountable at election time. I will be visiting your candidacy offices for Kelloway and Manley soon with some Nova Scotians for Equalization Fairness members to ask why you are ignoring this important issue. To the public, I ask you not to vote for any candidate who chooses to ignore the biggest problem we face here in the CBRM. The lack of funding and investment into our community has almost destroyed us and excessive taxation is causing more and more people to start worrying about losing their homes. Some residents might have their taxes capped but the young people who are building here do not have a cap. Ask them what they are paying in property taxes and get ready for a shock. Keeping us poor will generate more home ownership issues and any politician who will not talk about equalization does not deserve your vote. Party values should not be their priority. People should be. Rev. Dr. Albert Maroun, Sydney

Posted by
Receive news by email and share your news and events for free on goCapeBreton.com
SHOW ME HOW


2,368 2

2

Log In or Sign Up to add a comment.
Depth
Chris Gallant Follow Me
Since equalization is a federal program delivered to provinces to address needs of municipalities, why do we not have all levels of government working together on this issue? Council, our MLAs, and our MPs need to recognize that they were all elected by the people to represent their needs; not to fight and argue with one another. I propose a joint task force to address Cape Breton’s needs, including equalization, to meet at least quarterly. There are things that can be done at each level of government and our elected representatives need to be doing them. We won’t always agree on how best to resolve some issues, but we can negotiate, find common ground, and move forward with a solid plan to better Cape Breton. It’s about cooperation and doing what’s best for the people who put them there; not about partisan politics.
Mark Floerke Follow Me
Some of the words used, at the end of a paragraph, have me wondering. Father Maroun ended the paragraph with; “…funding that is sent for a specific reason”. I realize I am taking this out of context, but what if CBRM council and regional MLAs are to be very specific in their request for a fair share of equalization payments, and where or to what they are to be applied. The specificity may possibly make it more challenging to turn down, politically.

Facebook Comments

View all the LATEST
and HOTTEST posts
View

Share this comment by copying the direct link.

  • Our Sponsors

Using this website is subject to the Terms of Use that contain binding contractual terms.