Melford Signs Deal with Terminal Operator SSA

If this were a race, I think we'd have to say that Melford has just taken the lead.

News out of Seattle, Washington is that Melford International Terminal has inked a deal with SSA Marine and Cyrus Capital Partners to develop the long-planned, 315-acre marine container terminal at the Strait of Canso.

Here's the news release:

America Gets New First Port of Call

Melford Atlantic Gateway project in Nova Scotia Will Connect Canadian and US Markets to Rail

Seattle, Washington - SSA Marine, Melford International Terminal and Cyrus Capital Partners, L.P. have announced their joint venture and investment in the Melford Atlantic Gateway. The 315-acre marine container terminal will be constructed at the Strait of Canso, Nova Scotia, and will become the closest North American port on the Great Circle Route to Europe and Asia via the Suez Canal. The fully permitted terminal is specially designed to accommodate Ultra Large Container Vessels for both trans-shipment throughout North America’s East Coast and intermodal service to Eastern Canada and US markets through a connection to the Canadian National (CN) rail system.

“This is an exciting initiative for SSA Marine,” said SSA Conventional President Mark Knudsen. “We have spent considerable effort over the years examining terminal opportunities on the East Coast of North America and we believe Melford, with its 20 meters of draft and the ability to reduce delivery time to US and Canadian markets by 2 to 6 days, via a local rail connection to the CN network, excellent workforce and private ownership combines all the beneficial attributes to quickly establish itself as the preeminent first port of call for North America.”

“The Melford team is elated with this partnership,” said Melford President Paul Martin. “We have been working on this project for a number of years and the investment by SSA Marine, the leading terminal operator in North America, demonstrates a huge vote of confidence in this initiative. SSA Marine’s relationships and service history, with the world’s leading steamship lines, will assure the lines of receiving the highest level of service,” he said.

Mr. Martin also recognized Nova Scotia’s well-known skilled labor force, and said their support for this project, combined with the support of the local community and community leaders, create a unique opportunity for streamlined construction and startup activities.

Taking advantage of the extensive network and superior service of CN in Canada and the United States, the Melford Terminal has the potential to serve Eastern Canada and Midwest US markets in a very competitive and efficient manner.

The Honorable Stephen McNeil, Premier, Nova Scotia said, “We welcome this new private investment that recognizes our strong system of existing infrastructure, our training abilities, our skilled workers, and business friendly environment that the Province of Nova Scotia provides to companies investing in our region.”

Rodger Cuzner, Member of Parliament in the Government of Canada, said, "What is most remarkable to me is that this incredible deal was developed with independent financing and no public funds. The team that developed this project is to be commended for the establishment of partnerships and the continued efforts to increase activity in the Strait of Canso region and all of Nova Scotia.”

About SSA Marine

SSA Marine is the world's largest independent, privately-held marine terminal operator, with activities at nearly 250 terminal facilities and rail operations throughout the U.S., Canada, Mexico, Central America, South America, Asia, New Zealand and South Africa. Since its foundation in 1949, SSA Marine has continued to grow, always focusing on its customers' interests. The SSA terminal in Panama has doubled its handling capacity in time for completion of the canal. Other affiliates of SSA Marine are also working on significant expansion projects in the United States, Mexico, Chile, Colombia and Vietnam.

About Melford Terminal

Melford International Terminal is a privately-held developer, the owners of which include a partnership of Nova Scotia businessmen as well as majority owner Cyrus Capital Partners, L.P. of the US and UK. The Nova Scotia owners as well as Cyrus will continue to play an active role in the development of the Melford Atlantic Gateway Terminal.

UPDATE

I emailed Mark Knudsen of SSA Marine to ask a few questions and here are his responses:

1. Did you consider Sydney harbor as an option for a terminal?

Yes, we have looked at both terminal locations, and in our view, rapid, efficient, and cost effective rail service is key to the success of this project, and we believe that the Straits [sic] of Canso location provides superior connectivity to the CN network. Both locations have the ability to develop a terminal to support the vessel activity, but the superior rail connection, and the ability to design and build a terminal from the start for the specific purpose of efficient cargo movement led us to work with the terminal proposal on the Straits of Canso.

2. Does this deal involve an actual financial investment by SSA Marine or Cyprus Capital? If so, can you tell me how much it will be worth?

Yes, both SSA Marine and Cyrus Capital are making financial investments in the project. The project has incurred significant expenses to date to get it as far as it is, and will require significant investment to complete the construction. Order of magnitude cost to bring a terminal like this on line will be at least $250 Million.

A project of this size will normally be funded by a combination of debt (borrowed at commercial rates from financial institutions) and equity (supplied by the investors). It is premature to estimate what the split between those two funding sources will be at this time, and it is premature to say what the conditions of the debt issuance may involve.

3. What is the next step for the project?

Now that we have formed and announced our partnership, we will be reaching out to shipping lines, cargo owners, and others to complete the commercial aspects, reaching out to financial institutions to develop the funding mechanisms, developing the pre-constructions packages and work, and the many other steps necessary to get the project ready to start construction.

Posted by
Receive news by email and share your news and events for free on goCapeBreton.com
SHOW ME HOW


8,731 63
https://capebreton.lokol.me/melford-signs-deal-with-terminal-operator-ssa
Business News

63

Log In or Sign Up to add a comment.
Depth
madeline yakimchuk Follow Me
Wow, Cape Breton could become the island playground for the entire mainland, and we are still close enough to have "cape breton" jobs right there in Canso. I hate to say it but Canso makes more sense than CBRM. We have so much more we could be doing. Imagine being close enough to a mega project like this to be able to work there, and far enough away to be able to relax on the weekend! I certainly hope we stop the race and support this initiative. Who wouldn't want to move to Port Hawkesbury or Antigonish, as compared to "out west".
kenzie macneil Follow Me
Melford's lead, Mary is illusional. You will note that the release does not talk about money to build the port - just that SSA Marine have agreed to act as the Port Operator. This is no different from the agreement that Melford had with Mar. before Mar went into receivership. Without agreements with a Shipping Company, Building Investors backed with a labour agreement - Melford remains a wishful thought. Too bad the Premier jumped out on this one and referred to it as "private investment". That's a tad embarrasing.
Mary Campbell My Post Follow Me
Could be, Kenzie, I don't claim to be a port development expert (or a psychic). But I have to contrast this with the latest progress on the Port of Sydney project, which involved a secret visit to town by representatives of our Chinese "sister city."
Wayne O'Toole Follow Me
Well its a far stretch better then the Sydney Port has ever gotten and we have been dumping public money by the mega container load at it...so far somewhere above $150 million. Canso has huge advantage over Sydney as it is ice free, does not need dredging and has an existing railway. It also is closer to the hub. I think this will sink Cecils big fat lie or pipe dream to get him elected. Also Sydney is dealing with a Chinese company CCCC who is banned by UN and has stated that part of their deal was to bring a large percentage of labour from China. This is 10 step farther ahead then our mayor has gotten and if it moves forward any more will sink all public investment in Sydney harbour to Davey Jones locker. Imagine how far $150 million could have went to reduce our 33% child poverty (almost 43% from birth to 6). Imagine how far it could have went to help impoverished seniors. Our cruise business is not even profitable so it will take lifetimes if ever to recoup that $150m
dale finney Follow Me
CCC see ya later
Joe Ward Follow Me
In the chihuahua eat chihuahua world of rival press releases, I would give this one points for the *perception* of a little more meat on the chewstick. SSA Marine has an impressive list of Canadian and US locations as seen here: http://www.ssamarine.com/locations/index.html# In terms of credibility, IMO, this trumps the announcements about Canderel (real estate, not port development), McKeil (a single tugboat), or the "sister city" Dalian (seemingly more symbolic than substantive); and I think SSA Marine may gain a little more public confidence than CCCC is able to achieve. It's extremely unlikely that CCCC will deliver more than a vague thumbs up that the project can work, followed by an indication that they'd like to start the second dredge. TBD. I think this is definitely the type of announcement that makes Mayor Cecil Clarke even more happy that no rival mayoral candidate has yet announced. This will certainly be a major factor in reducing public confidence in his single focus on the port development long shot. Ultimately, I hope that Steve Sutherland and/or Wendy Bergfeldt follow up on this story today or tomorrow, and land an interview with SSA Marine. ►The most important question I'd like them to ask is whether they considered Sydney as an option and why they went with Melford instead. They can't possibly agree to become a port operator for Melford without having evaluated an alternative location so close by - with claimed competitive advantages. And it would be absurd to suggest they aren't aware of Sydney's lobbying for the greenfield site. Their answer to that question may be very enlightening, and it can also serve to legitimize whether or not their announcement for Melford is highly significant or not.
madeline yakimchuk Follow Me
and if they don't do it (Steve or Wendy), maybe Mary can!
Mary Campbell My Post Follow Me
This is from the JOC story: "'As with any project, customers, financing and construction are the challenges,'" said Mark Knudsen, president of conventional services at Seattle-based SSA. But, he said: 'We're jumping in with both feet and will do everything we can to move this project along.' "Knudsen said market studies have already been performed, and that joint venture participants will line up customers in advance of construction. 'We'll be reaching out to different customers to see what commitments we can get, and to get the level of commitments we need,' he told JOC.com." So, far from a done deal, but more of an advance than securing tug boat services or hiring a Montreal real estate firm to make a video of a logistics park, as you say.
Wayne O'Toole Follow Me
Exactly. SSA is also North America, not banned by World bank and the largest of their scope...which mean they have experience...Something NovaPorte does not. The harbour there does not need mulimilion dollar dredging projects and is naturally ice free. The railroad is existing a very short distance a way so minimum investment needed there as well. It is leaps above Sydney. I would bet on it more tge Sydney. Its not far away so economic impact will benefit just as well.
Mary Campbell My Post Follow Me
I've updated the story with answers to a couple of questions from SSA Marine.
Mathew Georghiou Follow Me
Any idea why this build is estimated at only $250 million whereas the Sydney Port is at $1.6 billion? That's over 6 times higher.
Joe Ward Follow Me
Maybe CCCC was planning to announce that they were making an *in-kind* equity investment of $1.35 Billion dollars, leaving only $250 million for other partners to cover (like the pension funds HPDP has mentioned a few times). ;) In seriousness, great question. I'm also very curious as to the disparity in estimates as well. I know that estimates started creeping up after they announced the grand Canderel component of NovaZone (the proposed logistics park). However, for two projects seemingly similar in scope, that is quite a large difference in costs. Did they price themselves out of consideration/business?
Mary Campbell My Post Follow Me
I immediately thought back to what Mann had said about their decision not to work with CCCC: "But, the problem with automation of course, there's a huge cost to automation, and there has to be a relationship, therefore, with the cost of construction, if you're using automation, and the volume of cargo that you have to pay for that. The more automation, the more costly the construction, the more cargo you need to pay for it and at some point, you know, you start to realize, we don't have that volume of cargo to pay for an automated terminal."
Paul Finney Follow Me
I see this more like a poker game than a race. In a race, you finish even when you know you can't win. If this were poker, Melford is holding aces and just called Sydney's bluff. Knudsen said SSA looked at both sites and chose Melford because it's the better site. It's ice-free with 50' draft under the ship at berth, no complicated rail route along the Bras d'Or, and Quay cranes can be constructed on solid rock at Melford, not on liquid sand like the Sydport greenfield. Knudsen says the Melford terminal will handle 2 million TEU's, similar to their Long Beach terminal at a cost of $250 million. Like Matthew said, this also makes me wonder why the projected cost of NovaPorte is $1.2 billion to handle the same number of TEU's, a billion dollars higher? Also, Sheehy recently stated the designation of CBRM as a foreign trade zone was critical to the development of NovaPorte/NovaZone, yet it didn't seem to be a factor in SSA's choice of Melford over Sydney. It's time for Sydney to show their hand or fold. If it's a bad hand, the responsible thing would be to cut the losses, concede and support Melford. It's still a great employment opportunity for Cape Bretoners and a boon for the province.
P Sheehan Follow Me
Paul, these are big projects and would get phased in so the $250 million may not be the total as compared to Sydney's $1.2 million or whatever . Milford has now said they will build the rail connector , they know they need rail. Sydney still doesn't have rail and there are no signs they are in a position to know they will have rail, so how long can they leave that component unresolved yet keep progressing on the overall project ? Why build anything or say you are building anything if you have no transportation link ?
Jason Morrison Follow Me
The tracks are still in place to Sydney and can be reactivated relatively quickly. G&W could have applied to abandon the line since April 1, they haven't filled yet. G&W is also in talks with the Sydney port group so I can't see G&W applying to remove the line when there is a chance they could get a major customer out of it. Melford on the other hand has to build about 30KM of new ROW before they can even lay a single rail, this would probably take well over a year given the short construction season. Perfectly doable but I doubt this construction of the new ROW would start before a shipper agrees to use the terminal.
Wayne O'Toole Follow Me
I would debate that. 30kms compared to major repair on 130kms. Some rail trussels have been identified as a complete rebuild at 10 mil a piece. Also the extra distance to the mainline will cause price increases. Whu would raillune owners not support Melford as much or more then Sydney. Less cost and time to build 30km then massive repair for much more. I suppose this post will get disliked...seems I have someone who dislikes an educated person providing real data.
Jason Morrison Follow Me
Are you implying I an an uneducated person? I am a member of the Scotia Rail Development Society trying to save the rail line to Sydney, I have been actively involved with the society since it started, my family was a railway family and I know many of the railway workers in this area who provide information to me and the society. I have read more reports over the rail line then I can remember. New ROW construction cost 3 to 5 million per mile, rehabilitating a deactivated rail line cost less then a million per mile. (relaying a rail line over an existing ROW cost 1 million per mile). G&W is not against either port as either port would give them a major customer, they have also stated they would run the Sydney Sub and do the required upgrades if the customer base increased. Although if either port lands a major container terminal I am sure you would see CN purchase the line to the new terminal. I railway tie gang can replace miles of ties per day so I can certainly guarantee Sydney Sub could be rebuilt before a new construction railway. As for trestles that require replacement on an active rail line, the industry practice is to build the new trestle next to the one to be replaced, the line can stay in service while the work goes on. Once the new trestle is completed the track is realigned to the new structure and the old structure is removed. Also please provide your "real data", I would like to compare it to the data I received from other railways about costs. Do you know which trestles would require a complete rebuild beside the two I stated in a previous post (Ottawa Brook). I am not aware of other trestles in dire need of repair/replacement.
madeline yakimchuk Follow Me
Jason, I am not sure who you are talking to, but I thought I would reply. I think we have gotten so far into details here, everyone defending their point of view with their set of hard or soft data, but this could really go on forever. Meanwhile, the business case will be the deciding factor. And we citizens will not be making that decision. It doesn't matter what you or I believe is cheaper, rail wise, the decision is broader and further away from us than that. I for one mourn the loss of the rail. I hope we get it back some day. I don't see details about which rail would be more expensive as useful at this point because it looks like the big players will decide which is the best location, based on all the hard data. Aside from the port, or no port, there are many reasons we should have rail. You don't have to convince me, even though I fall on the "Melford is the better choice" side of the broader discussion. The world is so big. The distance between Melford and CBRM is tiny. If we get a project of this size, it will be wonderful, and possibly more wonderful to be nearby rather than right under it. An international port will bring all kinds of good things, and it's share of bad things too. I don't trust the people behind the CBRM project at the moment. That does not mean I don't think it will happen. I do think it will happen, wherever it happens, with private money, or private money combined with unnecessary public expenditure. I just don't believe the public money going into this is for the good of us all. Expenditures should be being made on services under the jurisdiction of a municipal government in crisis. If our business case is better, and we get a better mayor to lead the project, wonderful. If Melford's case is better, I still hope we get a better mayor.
Wayne O'Toole Follow Me
Thank you Jason....I was digging to find out who the disliker was and their motive. Both which you have gratiously done.
Jason Morrison Follow Me
I have never disliked any of your comment so don't assume anything.
Wayne O'Toole Follow Me
Also Jason...if feasibility of Melford is superior to Sydney then rail is not the difference maker. It is sad to see rail disappear but it is not the one factor to base bashing Melford and giving Sydney a blessing. CBRM and the tactics and secrecy have turned many away. Non disclosures and giving sole rights without competition are some of the factors. I am not anti rail but that does not mean I need to be pro novaporte
Jason Morrison Follow Me
I will agree about rail is not the difference maker, but when people make comments that implies that rail is I will respond. In either ports case the rail will be completed/upgraded before the port itself is finished. I have never bashed Melford, I think both ports have there merits, I just feel (personal opinion) Sydney is more likely to happen out of the two but if Melford is built and not Sydney I am all for it. Its the same province after all ;) I also agree that non disclosures suck but I do understand that in some cases they are required by some the parties involved, I don't know the details about the Sydney port project so I don't know if they require the secrecy or not, but I too would love to know more details.
P Sheehan Follow Me
Jason: Can you explain why the old rail-liner type of rail car is no longer around ??? Are they a no-no?
Jason Morrison Follow Me
The Rail Diesel Car RDC (AKA rail liner and dayliner) were put into storage after the 1990 Via Rail cuts that decimated the Maritime rail network. Some have been scrapped but many have since been sold to American commuter railways, others are still in storage in various locations in Canada and are for sale (there are 8 in Moncton for sale). The RDCs were built from stainless steel and although they are over 60 years old they are great platforms to rebuilt with more efficient engines. This is what saved most of them from the scrap heap as a fully rebuilt RDC cost around 1.2 million compared to 3 to 4 million for a new build equivalent. There are no laws preventing RDCs from being used as they meet all current safety standards, VIA rail still has a small active fleet of them as well as some in storage. CN does place a restriction on them of 45mph while one thier tracks, but there concern is not warranted and no other railway puts a speed restriction on them. Hope this helps.
P Sheehan Follow Me
Maybe CBRM should invest in one of them and start a shuttle service just to prove the rail is viable . Those were great and thought I heard there are many used on US rail .
Paul Finney Follow Me
Great idea. They were great. A daily shuttle across CBRM and weekly to Halifax. The federal government is investing $3.4 billion on transportation. They should buy one and lease it to CBRM.
P Sheehan Follow Me
Jason : At some point in time these two port projects will reach a point of proceeding or not , or colliding with one another so to speak . Whichever gets ships contracted first will likely be first to become operational . Building that new rail line for Melford has the advantage of less time than to repair from Hastings to Sydney ,likely less cost too and gives value to the G&W rail line from Hastings to Truro with no cost to them . The Sydney port would have to proceed really fast to be able to be in time for G&W to want to start rebuilding the line from Hastings to Sydney . How long will that take? G&W doesn't look to be a big enough rail line to finance a complete rebuild of all the trestles, regardless that Buffett is apparently an investor. If they file to abandon than you'll know they do not intend to invest , so what does Sydney do then ? Will Cuzner get CN to take the line back ??
Paul Finney Follow Me
Sorry if I reiterate, but yes the two projects are mutually exclusive, and there is no rush for G&W to abandon. They aren't maintaining the line, the price of scrap steel is low, they are collecting crossing fees, and they are hedging their bet by waiting. If SSA announces a carrier for Melford, the terminal will get built and G&W will get paid to move containers from Hastings to Truro, with no significant investment. Rails from Sydney subdivision will supply spur to Melford. If Sydney pulls a rabbit out of the hat before Melford, G&W would likely sell the line to the Sydney operator rather than have to make a significant investment on a short line. In the big picture this business could be going to Halifax or Saint John, so barring no government investment, favoritism or intervention the best business case will win, and in either case it's good for this end of the province.
Jason Morrison Follow Me
Agreed only one port will be likely be built (if any). As for the rail link, the Sydney line is in place and can be put into use while being rehabilitated (at reduced speed). The new line to Melford would likely take a year or more to complete. As stated above the cost for the spur to Melford will be 3 to 5 million per mile. Sydney Sub would require 30 million in maintenance to bring the tracks speeds up to class 2. Additional work/money may be required for some of the bridges but this can go on while the line is running. I can't see G&W filing to abandon Sydney Sub while there is a chance Sydney could get a container terminal, if Melford lands a contract for a shipper first or if the Sydney container terminal become a dud then G&W will probably apply at that point. G&W is the largest short line operator in the world, they have the capital available to do the work required to any of their rail lines. I could only hope that the Sydney port has a back up plan if G&W does apply to abandon before a decision is finally made on the Sydney port. It's a wait and see scenario but wouldn't it be nice if both terminals open, what a game changer for this province.
madeline yakimchuk Follow Me
Well, we are close, but not close enough to be the same port, and if you think there will be two international ports in eastern NS, you are taking meds I would like you to share with me! :-)
Jason Morrison Follow Me
Lol, I doubt it would ever happen but I never rule anything out, there are other ports in North America a stones throw from each other so it could be a possibility. No meds, just two children under 5 that prevent me from getting a full night sleep. ;)
Mary Campbell My Post Follow Me
I see your much better analogy and I raise you...no, I fold. Poker game is a much better analogy!
P Sheehan Follow Me
How about "chase a port "? or just a plain "crap shoot"? or in CB parlance, a "donnybrook? .
Michael MacNeil Follow Me
How about monopoly with our property tax dollars Anybody notice if this was in the Cape Breton Post? This is a huge gamble for both locations. Sydney should play the right hand and put all their support behind Melford, excluding financial because we already wasted too many dollars that would have been better used for things like maybe helping reduce child poverty, cleaning our harbour or more realistic development projects on a smaller scale. Melford is not that far away to go to work if they ever become successful on large port development wether it be a Container Terminal or bulk breaking.
P Sheehan Follow Me
I get a kick out of Cuzner and MacNeil trying to take credit for something they had nothing to do with , but at the same time, both are manipulating the system to try to divert money to projects that are far less reasonable or practical. They both dance around the topic of rail and public transit which are so key to moving product and people . They prefer we burn our trees at the rate of 50 truck loads a day at a biomass plant because we/they have lost our ability to produce 2X4's let alone any valued wood product that the market really wants , like plywood or 2x8's . Oh no , Stevie thinks that investing in grapes and wine will bail us out . Not sure what Cuzner projects have helped us either, but then forgot about his Ben Eoin and that other resort project that didn't get completed .
Wayne O'Toole Follow Me
Nice job on the update...and they were transpsrent...much better then Sydney where we couldn't get an answer if we spyed outside our Mayors door.
Joe Ward Follow Me
At this point, the mayor would be in even deeper trouble in his re election bid, *if* only there was an actual mayoral candidate to challenge him. I hope whomever they are, they aren't off in China trying to secure two more sister/brother cities as the foundation of their campaign! :P So, for now, we'll have to hope for positive developments with the new faces that will be joining council.
Wayne O'Toole Follow Me
I think a cat in a funny hat could beat Clarke after this
madeline yakimchuk Follow Me
CBC NS responded to my prompt that they cover this story with a message that they are working on it. Both Wendy and Steve get lumped into CBC NS now, so it might be them, might not be. Nothing from the CB Post that I have heard of but I hope they are working on it. People who notice, even letters to the editor, please post them here so we don't miss them.
Mathew Georghiou Follow Me
The CB Post has run a story on this now. Three things really jumped out at me: (1) "The project cost is currently estimated at $450 million Canadian, or $350 million American." ME: Curious why this is so much higher than the $250 million. (2) "[SSA Marine is] the largest container terminal operator in North America and the largest independent terminal operator in the world,” Albert Barbusci, CEO of Harbor Port Development Partners, said: “We know of (SSA Marine), we know that they’re a good solid firm, but we’ve had no relationship, no contact with them in the past.” ME: Curious why HPDP would not even have attempted to contact the largest player in the industry. Would that not be your first call? (3) "Barbusci said he doesn’t know enough about the other Nova Scotian proposal to comment on it in comparison to Sydney’s." ME: Curious why port experts would not make efforts to know all the details of a competing port that is only a few miles away and could completely derail the Sydney Port project if it were to proceed. Sigh. I really wish there would be some straight talk. CB POST STORY: http://www.capebretonpost.com/News/Local/2016-07-08/article-4582266/Melford-inks-deal-with-terminal-operator/1
Joe Ward Follow Me
I took note of the same stuff. Points 2 and 3 practically jumped off of my monitor and onto my desk. I had to move my coffee cup to avoid a spill. ;) The fastest way to get kicked out of an MBA program would be to admit that you never thought of contacting the key player in the industry (who represents a primary missing element in the execution plan) or that you had no intel on your regional competitors. Hmm. I don't think first year biz students would make that kind of mistake. And it, therefore, seems very strange indeed for those who wish to be considered viable port marketers or developers to do so.
madeline yakimchuk Follow Me
Excellent points from both Mathew and Joe. I am embarrassed that our Mayor is so easily convinced of the calibre of such low calibre people. It reminds me of the poor lady who was swindled by the romance scam that was all over the news the other day. When you have an itch and a very narrow horizon, someone is bound to offer to scratch it for a price, whether they know what they are doing or not. Poor Cecil. Poor CBRM. But did you hear the delightfully provincial Charlottetown mayor on the Halifax Examiner today? They hired Peter Kelly and just can't understand what the problem is, or why they should have googled him. He had references! You have to listen to the podcast if you want a laugh, and if you want to put our leadership in an Atlantic context. Tim put the telephone interviews on the podcast as is, and they couldn't help but chuckle afterward. He didn't even give them a hard time... it wouldn't have gotten through. Heaven help us if they don't hand over the reins soon.
Mathew Georghiou Follow Me
Wow, that was quite the phone call. For those interested, starts at 12:38 https://www.halifaxexaminer.ca/province-house/why-would-we-google-examineradio-episode-69/
madeline yakimchuk Follow Me
kind of puts things into an atlantic context eh? The previous interview was great too... he called the people out west "inbreeds"... it was cute.
Mary Campbell My Post Follow Me
All I can say is, I hope Charlottetown has municipal elections this fall, too...
Bill Fiander Follow Me
Will the same scrutiny directed at the Sydney Port be now directed at Melford?
madeline yakimchuk Follow Me
I certainly hope so, by the people of Melford. Do you think it is up to the people of CBRM to do that?
Bill Fiander Follow Me
Then shouldn't we be cheering to see that Sydney is successful in becoming an international port over Melford instead of becoming cheerleaders for Melford to the detriment of the Sydney Port? Perhaps I'm not up to speed on everything going on with the Sydney Port concept. But wouldn't it be great, despite all the faults in the roll up to getting the port going, that the Sydney Port becomes a success. If Melford succeeds, and hats of to them if they do, then there will be no container port in Sydney, no influx of jobs, no change in the status quo, except to see more people leaving Cape Breton.
Joe Ward Follow Me
It would be great if Sydney was successful in developing a port (in a general context). But cheering isn't what is going to make that happen. The better business case and more experienced port developers are the important factors. If HPDP had been paying attention, they could have prepared a plan to pitch their proposed competitive advantages over the rival Melford location directly to SSA Marine. How could they possibly not have done so? Now, even if Sydney did turn out to be the better choice, they've allowed a competing project to gain what appears to be a major strategic advantage. And that's yet another example of why they are the subject of frequent criticism.
madeline yakimchuk Follow Me
A couple of things Bill. First of all, from my perhaps somewhat broader point of view, a success in Melford is a success for Cape Breton. People could easily work there and live on the island, and people could certainly develop support and service industry here. Many experts, including the large port operator SSA apparently, have looked at both places and consider Melford to be more logical. No ice, solid land rather than sand to build on, and a deeper harbour. Why do we insist? Why don't we support them? Why are we stuck in the US vs THEM mentality? This isn't high school hockey where you are supposed to "cheer" for the "home" team no matter what. Cape Breton is not special anymore. We are part of that part of NS which is not Halifax, and we need to work together. For heavens sake, if we in Sydney worked with North Sydney when it comes to ferry/cruise visitors we would be so much further ahead than focusing on me, me, me. It is time to grow up and cooperate. A single human life is very short. We forget that over the ages people have migrated. Everything changes. Insisting on an industrial CBRM from the past (and that is what many people mean when they say CB) is holding us in the past. There are so many other things that could be done here. We need a change in leadership and a view toward a different future.
Wayne O'Toole Follow Me
Not this I agree with. Why are we in a "us against them" situation. Would it not be better to weight which port has the best chance and support it. Its still Cape Breton...still close jobs and opportunity for growth of the island. Why would Sydney not have discussions with Melford and come to a fecision on which is more viable for success and support the better ootion.
P Sheehan Follow Me
Wayne: To unravel a story like this one , start making a list with names in one column and then money they may make from the project in a second column (for every name) or some of other benefit they'll receive and you'll start to maybe see what drives their actions .The difference here though is that Melford is private sector driven and Sydney's Port is not . As a result , government money will more likely flow to many more people during development than will with Melford .
Wayne O'Toole Follow Me
Oh its qquite obvious who a few players are in Sydney...just look at providing sole marketing to people without a competition...not heard of in private sector. Or who buys land for a million and a bit and sells a small percentage back for 6 million. Not hard at all to see where money that should be feeding hungry kids is being funneled
P Sheehan Follow Me
Developing a project , no matter what , needs to go through a process , a project plan , that is continually changing as new factors arise along the way . In any financial institution,every request for finances will go through a rigorous analysis . One term you'll hear in the financial world is the "market and risk analysis"which is a process to weigh not only the financials of the project but to weigh the projects path to success. Obviously in this Sydney ports situation , you have local but also world wide level factors to weigh . What seems to be bubbling away here is a sense by many ,at least in this forum, that there are clear signs the people managing and directing this Sydney project, including the Mayor ,are not demonstrating that they have all their ducks in order . We know Halifax has been loosing shipping calls and container volumes for several years ,while at the same time rebuilding the MacDonald bridge to be able to have the larger container ships get to the Fairview container terminal . They are loosing to their USA competition .Melford has been on the drawing board a lot longer than Sydney's Nova Port. We already see that when it comes to rail, ice free harbour , water depths and location on the map , Melford seems to have a big advantage over NovaPort let alone Halifax . The time is now here for the Sydney project people to start to show just why this Port will be a better investment for taxpayers or governments than investing in Halifax or Melford. Taxpayers seem to have lost confidence in the CBRM council on this and other issues and yet Council seems to ignore them . Shades of ECBC in a way . The taxpayers can't do much but start to worry when information is withheld and not even tabled at Council , or not passing the smell test . Brexit should be a lesson to a all politicians .
madeline yakimchuk Follow Me
The CBC NS story. I haven't read it yet, wanted to share first! http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/nova-scotia/melford-terminal-global-canso-nova-scotia-ssa-marine-container-ships-1.3670624
Joe Ward Follow Me
Quote: "Mayor Cecil Clarke was not willing to speak Friday about developments at Melford. "We will not be commenting on anyone else's project. We are going ahead with full confidence," he said via spokeswoman Christine Lamey.
madeline yakimchuk Follow Me
Stubborn fella. I hear he holds a grudge forever. If he could only get riled up about child poverty it would be great.
Joe Ward Follow Me
He needs to lose the grudge and focus, or he might end up working for PEI, promoting concerts.
madeline yakimchuk Follow Me
I guess we shouldn't be joking. Unless someone comes out against him who is credible, he will be our mayor, and I will NEVER work in tourism :-)
Joe Ward Follow Me
A highly developed sense of levity is a key Cape Breton survival characteristic. ;) #StrangeJobAndHisDonuts
Dan Yakimchuk Follow Me
Dr. StrangeJob was asked Friday to speak about recent mayoralty developments. “I will not be commenting on anyone else’s campaign. I am moving forward with full non-disclosure,” he said via spokesperson (name withheld due to non-disclosure agreement). He did mention, however, that CBRM citizens are welcome to view his transparent platform at https://capebreton.lokol.me/dr-strangejob-for-mayor. He did share his new campaign slogan – A vote for Dr. StrangeJob is not a spoiled ballot, but a spoiler of unbalance.
P Sheehan Follow Me
Sounds like there is some heat in his kitchen. Still seems a bit unclear how many millions the CBGM is risking as they spend on this, and doesn't matter that they got money from ECBC , ACOA or whoever , it is still money being spent .
seek-warrow-w
  • 1
arrow-eseek-e1 - 10 of 10 items

Facebook Comments

View all the LATEST
and HOTTEST posts
View

Share this comment by copying the direct link.

  • Our Sponsors

Using this website is subject to the Terms of Use that contain binding contractual terms.