Pokémon Go, Cecil Clarke, and a Sad Reminder of Archibald's Wharf

Photo background by Robert R. MacDonald

"But they're behind the fence..."

Those are the words of some North Sydney youth enjoying the phenomenon of the new Nintendo "Pokemon Go" app. It's a game that uses augmented reality to let players (called trainers) track down and capture make believe creatures called Pokemon. Augmented reality technology lets players see the Pokemon characters in the real world through their smartphone camera.

Although the youth probably didn't realize the significance, a member of the "Taking Back the Northside" Facebook group was given a bit of a sad reminder of the loss of the Archibald's Wharf green space.

In the game, Nintendo bases the map on the real world. Pokemon of many different species - sometimes rare and popular enough to draw a crowd - will appear somewhere in the real world. Then players have to actually go to that real world location - to track them down and try to capture them.

The game includes data about local attractions and monuments, and the Pokemon are often found hiding nearby.

If you had been around the Joan Harriss Cruise Pavilion in downtown Sydney early Saturday evening, you might have spotted a group of young adults hanging out near the top of the entrance from the Esplanade. With the majority of them focused very intently on their smartphones, it was a good bet that some kind of Pokemon was expected to emerge nearby.

Archibald's Wharf is Behind the Fence Now

That's how the North Sydney youth ran into a minor issue with their Pokemon hunt. The mapping data in the game uses data collected by another project such as Google Maps - and it's sometimes outdated

In the Pokemon world, Archibald's Wharf is still recognized as a public park and green space in downtown North Sydney.

And it even shows the "Chill Zone" ice cream shop sign in the image. That's the ice cream operator that was forced to move by the CBRM. He ended up having to relocate across the harbour, only to realize there was a delay in getting all necessary services set up to run his business.

Seeing this in the game struck a nerve with a parent who realized that the loss of the Archibald's Wharf green space was now being realized in a way that nobody could have predicted.

Pokemon Go players may be lead to Archibald's Wharf only to find what was once a public park is now secured behind a security fence. If there's anything redeeming about that, perhaps it's that the Pokemon have found a temporary refuge.

Cecil Clarke has an Archibald's Wharf Problem

Obviously the Pokemon game is of very little concern to residents of North Sydney. It's just an interesting symbol of a much larger issue.

What it really points out is that the loss of the Archibald's Wharf green space is still as unpopular as ever. And just months away from municipal elections in October, it's an issue that is certain to cause a major loss of votes for Mayor Clarke's re-election campaign. On the Northside, for some, he's about as popular as Donald Trump, albeit with a much better haircut.

The loss of votes won't be isolated there.

Clarke has gambled everything in his misguided "If not the port, then what?" strategy, but hasn't delivered anything tangible for the citizens of the Cape Breton Regional Municipality during his 4 years of tenure.

Commentary in the Cape Breton Post and social media show an overwhelming critical review of his performance. And at present a company named Léger Marketing is reportedly conducting telephone surveys to gauge the intent of voters for the upcoming election.

A recent announcement informed us that the rival Melford Terminal secured SSA Marine as an investor and port operator at only about 20% of the cost. They have no full automation strategy that would anger union workers, and are a closer distance to tie into the key rail network. As such, Clarke's basket of (non-Pokemon) eggs was toppled off the table. It remains to be seen how many have a shell still intact.

Archibald's Wharf is Gone. Now What?

Though the CBRM has a buy-back clause if the purchaser didn't invest $5 million by May 2016, they'll never execute it. It was too poorly drafted, making any attempt at buying it back nearly impossible. Even if they attempted to do so, they would be whipped in court by legal team of the new owner. Unless the owner decides they want to sell it back at some point, the green space is gone for good.

Some people ask why others bother to continue to make Archibald's Wharf an issue if nothing can be done about it now.

And that's a good question, with an vitally important answer:

Archibald's Wharf isn't just one bad deal for the CBRM. It represents the potential for the people who made that deal to repeat it many times over again. Once you give up green space where millions were invested, in the heart of a downtown, you can't get it back.

Is the Mayor and Current Council a Risk to the Well Being of the CBRM?

If the residents of North Sydney couldn't convince the mayor and council to pull out of the Archibald's Wharf deal, it's very unlikely that any amount of public backlash will stop them in future deals.

Fortunately, citizens are granted the biggest power of all, once every four years. They get to vote in the municipal elections.

At least four councillor positions will see changes for certain. Two announced they are not reoffering, and sadly two of them passed away.

By the way, the answer is "yes". The current mayor and council are definitely a risk to the well being of our community.

Did you know that the councillors voted to approve the Archibald's Wharf sale after being given the agreement the night before voting on it, and had insufficient time to actually review the deal?

Let's have Councillor Eldon MacDonald describe it for us in this video:

The Video Demonstrates Irresponsibility

If you watched the video, Eldon MacDonald described how he couldn't stay awake trying to get through the agreement. The rest of the councillors presumably were also given the agreement only last minute.


But even after hearing Eldon speak about it, most of them voted for it anyway. And that's irresponsible.

For those who step up to be councillor, they have to be committed to doing the job right. It's not a place to coast along just to top up retirement income. These roles and the decisions they make within them have immeasurable influence upon the entire future of Cape Breton and the CBRM.

Archibald's Wharf continues to be an unforgettable, emblematic symbol of that irresponsibility.

While many younger residents of the CBRM are out hunting for new Pokemon, many voting age residents from youth to retirement are hunting for a new mayor and council reps.

We need leaders who can augment the reality of the quality of life and future for our families in Cape Breton.


That's not what we have now. And Pokemon Go just so happens to be a very strange, but effective reminder.

Tell your candidates for district council that you want them to take the 15-point Councillors' Pledge.

Posted by
Receive news by email and share your news and events for free on goCapeBreton.com
SHOW ME HOW


6,088 7
https://capebreton.lokol.me/pokemon-go-cecil-clarke-and-a-sad-reminder-of-archibalds-wharf
Gov Election Past Elections Election News & Issues Gov Political Commentary

7

Log In or Sign Up to add a comment.
Depth
Stephanie Langley Follow Me
Great synopsis Joe! The time for change is now!
P Sheehan Follow Me
Waterfront land is the rare land anyone can own . Any city with waterfront has big advantage , but only if they develop it right . North Sydney has all that ferry traffic draw upon . Thousands of tourists. Now tell me,what is being done to capture those tourists BEFORE they enter the ferry compound to find that they are practically trapped. "What can we walk to" is their question . Instead of having parkland or related commercial facilities , you now have a "shipyard ". You sold that land for $2 million . Wonder what a condo developer would have done with that? The same kind of silliness has happened along the Dartmouth waterfront and parts of Halifax , until the politicians realized that mixing touristy commercial and housing was good mix , just like has been done in Old Montreal , Victoria, Boston , St John's , even little Victoria Harbour in PEI . The process and staff that recommended this was a good deal for CBRM failed Math 101 ,let alone Tax revenues 101 ,let alone planning 101 ..
Mike Johnson Follow Me
It was sold for $200k!!, plus $50k for alternative recreation that never materialized or was spent without input from the Citizens. As you reference, it should have been develop as a Tourist Center, though the higher offer to purchase for that purpose was ignored. The only two Councilors who voted against were MacD and Rowe. For that reason alone, the rest should go!
Mike Johnson Follow Me
Eldon that is, George does not vote against anything, and was one of the biggest Sale Supporters!
P Sheehan Follow Me
$200K . You got to be kidding . You can't get half of an old company house in Inverness now unless you pay more than that. Boy, we have real problems on CB and they ain't going to get better if this kind of thing keeps up at CBRM ,and CBRM seems to act like it is the smartest municipality of all. So we the Wharf bad financial deal . You have a Port deal that has a lot of smell to it . You have grand monies going from one part of city operations to another , and to many who didn't qualify , all recommended by the same lovely staff and approved by the same smart councillors . Billy Joe should run for mayor of the whole island !!!.
Michael MacNeil Follow Me
The CBRM has no choice but to get that land back and to nicely put the CME shipyard in Sydport.( Marine Industrial Park) It is a discussion that needs to happen with all the new council and mayor. The CBRM can not afford to snub the NFLD ferries with 1400 good paying jobs and 300000 passengers a year. Sure not all the 1400 jobs are in North Sydney but a good number of them are. It might be the biggest employer in the CBRM. I know that no other ferry in Nova Scotia carries more passengers per year and that includes the Cruise ships. Also you need to look at CME's future. There is not enough room for them to expand into a large shipyard like they could do at Sydport with a floating drydock. We need a condo/apartment/hotel developer like Marty Chernin or Membertou to step in here and talk reason with these parties before one of the biggest mistakes in the future of harbour development is made. This affects all districts of the CBRM
Robert MacDonald Follow Me
"If not the Port then what?" is in reference to the city of Sydney. You don't replace existing urban green spaces with industry in 2016 period. Rather than subject the cruise ship passengers (forget the tourists travelling to and from Nfld) to any unpleasantness, it was thought best to tuck CME out of sight in North Sydney. Anyone who votes to re elect this mayor and council of a so called amalgamated government deserve what they get. Oh and just a shout out to my fellow residents of CBRM... In particular those armchair environmentalists, all fervently blue bagging, saving the whales, "Good Lord, what about the next generation!", conscientious residents of our fair isle. Where were you when we needed you to stand up and be heard?

Facebook Comments

View all the LATEST
and HOTTEST posts
View

Share this comment by copying the direct link.

  • Our Sponsors

Using this website is subject to the Terms of Use that contain binding contractual terms.