Warning — Goodwill Goes a Long Way in Cape Breton

I’m posting this as a helpful guide (or warning) to any organizations that have, or plan to have, projects in Cape Breton.

I’ve seen too many public relations failures that end up creating controversy and divisiveness in our community — much of which can easily be avoided with modern thinking.

Here are a few examples:

  • Donkin Mine
  • Municipal Funding — CBRM vs Province of NS
  • Sydney Cottage Road B&B Demolition
  • Sydney Fire Station on George Street
  • Cabot Airport 
  • Big Pond RV park
  • Mother Canada Statue
  • Port of Sydney (x10)
  • And many more that you can post in the comments below.

What do these projects have in common?

First, they alter the physical landscape of Cape Breton Island in some way.  

Second, they used old-school thinking when it came to communicating with the local community — mostly keeping us in the dark.

The result — lots of controversy. 

Rumours and misinformation spread. Supporters and critics organized. Neighbours were pitted against neighbors. And instead of building goodwill in Cape Breton, these projects divided us. 

I'm not saying that the projects themselves are bad — some may be very good for Cape Breton. The problem is in the lack of communication.

Build Goodwill

My objective here is to help good projects do good for the community, so allow me to describe the old-school method so it can avoided. 

Here’s how it typically goes:

  • You think up a project.
  • You privately contact a few politicians to get them onside.
  • You put out a news release.
  • Your news release gets picked up by the local media.
  • The local media asks a few softball questions and never challenges your claims.
  • A story or two is published that makes you look good.

So far so good you’re thinking.  But not so fast!

  • You begin working on the project.
  • People start hearing more about the project but have no real information.
  • You are focused on your project and do not feel a need to share any more information (because that's what old-school thinking is about).
  • Concerns about the project begin to develop.
  • Rumors start to spread — some are true, some are not.
  • You ignore them (because that’s what old-school thinking is about). 
  • You continue working on the project.
  • Controversy builds.
  • You ignore it again (because that’s what old-school thinking is about).
  • Controversy organizes and now there is serious momentum against your project.
  • You panic and try to get support from the media and politicians to tell your side of the story.
  • That doesn't work, so you launch efforts to rally the broader community to your side — with the promise of jobs, or modernization or other carrot. 

But it’s too late.  The damage has been done.  You cannot overcome the rumours and misinformation and organized resistance.  Even if your project succeeds, you’ve failed to uplift the community.  A project that was good is now not so good.

What happened?

The old-school method used to work when people got their news from one or two sources.  And when citizens were less focused on the environment and less likely to question their leadership.

But it’s a new world.  We get our news from everywhere.  We no longer trust our news sources or our leadership. While at the same time, we believe crazy conspiracy theories. That’s irony right there — not trusting anything while believing in everything.

How the heck do you combat that?

The answer is through thoughtful and deliberate communication. And being transparent and authentic. From the beginning of a project through to the end. Keep the wider community informed. 

And you have to do this using popular communication channels — you cannot rely on the news media to tell your story.  Why — because the news media will only publish a tiny part of your message. They may not ask the important questions.  And they often get your responses wrong too. 

You need to go deep. You need to give the community more information, not less. And it has to come from you.

This type of communication is not hard. You just have to be aware of how critical it is to do — and then do it.

Because if you don’t tell your story, someone else will — and you probably won’t like it.

Posted by
Receive news by email and share your news and events for free on goCapeBreton.com

858 7
Gov Political Commentary


Log In or Sign Up to add a comment.
Joe Ward Follow Me
Much needed advice! The mayor corrected me the other day on an aspect of the “new deal” (Bill 340/MunicipaI Reform) that I wasn’t 100% on. But, she indicated it was very clear in the legislation. Sorry, that I missed it on my $0/hour salary, solo mission, of helping inform the public in the absence of them (mayor/council/CBRM) making a meaningful attempt to do so. We’re in a transitional period of communication that could go much more gracefully if they would heed your very clear advice. I have a strategy I use quite a bit. If folks won’t give the answers, I’ll share my conjecture. And if it takes flight, it creates pressure for them to respond. But, the same effects you tell them to heed also happen organically, without any gamesmanship.
Mathew Georghiou My Post Follow Me
People don't realize how much goodwill can be earned by sharing information in a transparent and authentic way.
Raymond Mac Donald Follow Me
Right on!!!!111
Raymond Mac Donald Follow Me
Awesome article.I smelled a rat in this story even if there isn't one.I feel our media let's us down on a regular basis.I'm not blaming the reporters themselves because I'm sure they have the skills but their MANAGEMENT/EDITORS.Most cities have media sources who ask tough questions with the gloves off.We don't.
Mathew Georghiou My Post Follow Me
You may appreciate this video about how corruption becomes rampant in the absence of investigative journalism: https://capebreton.lokol.me/these-are-great-times-for-corrupt-politicians
Raymond Mac Donald Follow Me
I think people are catching on to this source.I think GOCAPEBRETON is an awesome source for news.I sent many things to regular media the last few years and it was simply ignored.Here,folks can chime in and at times get their knuckles rapped which is ok because it brings out even more valuable information. Just a note:I think that attempt at the secret vote to sell CBRM land to the GOLD MINE folks this past summer,with the residents getting wind of it thru the back door was a prime example of"SNEAKY".Us guys out here gotta watch for that.
Raymond Mac Donald Follow Me
When I say this story I mean the "SECRET DEMOLITION OF THE B AND B".There's a lot more reporting to be done on this story.People are hiding something.You just don't wake up some morning and see a magnifigant home{assessed at $500,000 so market value around $700,000}simply gone with no advance warning."There it was......gone" just took on a whole new meaning.

Facebook Comments

View all the LATEST
and HOTTEST posts

Share this comment by copying the direct link.

  • Our Sponsors

Using this website is subject to the Terms of Use that contain binding contractual terms.