Whitney Pier Councillor Jim MacLeod to Volunteer: "Shut Up"

A few weeks ago, I told you about Rod Gale, a man from South Bar who paints his own lines. Mr. Gale is a vocal community advocate and volunteer who takes matters into his own hands.

That means getting involved in local groups like those attempting to save the "Stone Church" and Cape Breton Yacht Club; speaking out on social media; calling for both the assistance and the accountability of elected officials; and actually getting out there and volunteering to do community work himself.

If you haven't yet heard about Rod, check out my intro here.

CBC Journalist Interviews Local Councillor Jim MacLeod

When CBC journalist Molly Woodgate heard of Rod's latest project, she interviewed him and his local councillor, Jim MacLeod.

Rod had been documenting his activities at a neglected local site called Polar Bear beach, and unmaintained local tennis courts. He installed new posts, ran safety lines, cleaned up garbage, donated a new public trash bin, mowed the lawn, and even cleaned up and painted new lines on the tennis court.

But Mr. Gale is persistent. He knows what is expected of local politicians and he has no qualms about letting them know when he's not impressed with something happening in the community. In this case, it was the neglect of public spaces in an area that gets very little attention from the CBRM.

For his summer activities, he didn't get much help. However, Rod acknowledged that after complaining on social media, the CBRM did send a crew to complete the lawn mowing that he had begun. Though it wasn't much, he managed to compel at least a little accountability.

But the CBC wanted to interview his local District 12 councillor, Jim MacLeod too.

MacLeod Says "Shut Up"

As a keen observer of human nature, there isn't much that surprises me anymore. However, Councillor MacLeod's response wasn't something I anticipated.

Though he stated that he "does appreciate everything Gale has done for the community", he had a harsher message for Mr. Gale and presumably others who might speak out on social media:

"Now I'm tired of listening to this here stuff on Facebook. I mean if you haven't got something good to say about somebody, then maybe you should shut up." - Councillor Jim MacLeod, District 12

Rod Gale's persistence is a measure of his love of his community and an unwillingness to allow it to be neglected. Unfortunately for Mr. MacLeod, communication and dealing with complaints from residents is a part of the job. And social media is only going to become a more important and active communication tool between citizens and their elected officials.

Mr. MacLeod is in his 70s now and has earned his pension in his career. If he's not up to the task, or is bothered by citizen engagement, it may be time for him to relinquish his role as councillor. He can choose to move aside for the next generation to seize the opportunity to play a role in their community.

He was recently featured as one of the five in my article "Five Fellows to Fire" about the mayor and four councillors who sit on the Port of Sydney Development Corporation board. They do so despite the corporate articles forbidding elected officials in that role. In the article, Jim acknowledges that things don't get done when you don't have "professional opinions". Yet he continues to sit on that board. And so it is that his judgement and behavior is now in question.

I personally believe it's time for Councillor MacLeod to step down and enjoy his retirement.  We need someone with the full focus and energy to lead in District 12. They must not have grown weary of serving the public, nor become dismissive or disrespectful to those using new communication tools to demand better for their community.

The fire pit Rod Gale created at Polar Beach for locals to enjoy, despite criticism from Councillor MacLeod for speaking out on social media.

"It's our community. Don't wait for someone else to do it. Get out there and do it yourself." 

The good news is: Rod Gale didn't pack up his tools and go home. He shook it off and got back to work. He's since created a fire pit area on the beach area and announced that a tennis club in Truro heard about his story and donated lots of equipment for the court he single handedly restored.

Shown above some of the gear the Truro Tennis club donated to Rod after seeing his efforts to restore neglected local tennis court. They also sent rackets.

Posted by
Receive news by email and share your news and events for free on goCapeBreton.com
SHOW ME HOW


8,115 25
https://capebreton.lokol.me/whitney-pier-councillor-jim-macleod-to-volunteer-shut-up
Gov Election Past Elections Election News & Issues Gov Political Commentary

25

Log In or Sign Up to add a comment.
Depth
Jim Clark Follow Me
I wonder if anyone has suggested that Rod Gale run for coucillor? I know nothing of the man, however his desire to help his community and his drive to overcome obstacles gives him the highest of marks from my perspective.
Wayne O'Toole Follow Me
Rod would crush MacLeod in an election. He is respected and well known. It waa suggested but he hasn't come forward and likely will not.
[comment deleted] Posted
Joe Ward My Post Follow Me
I saw a media report that suggested that the flags have faded and the monument has high maintenance costs: http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/nova-scotia/whitney-pier-melting-pot-replaced-1.3545165 Your suggestion that the intent to remove the monument is due to racism is a very strong allegation. What is the group that you identify as having a racist agenda, and which of the flags do they allegedly take issue with? If this is something that can be substantiated, it's certainly very concerning. However, is there really an indication that this is about racism, or is it simply a question of whether or not to replace a deteriorating monument that is hard to maintain? If the rest of your suggestions are accurate, it does not appear that Mr. MacLeod has not been a very effective advocate for his district. However, I would invite those who have an alternative view to post a comment to address some of these various criticisms.
[comment deleted] Posted
Joe Ward My Post Follow Me
I think the communities tend to get a little caught up in building monuments. A candidate in North Sydney recently suggested that an old monument style park plan would be a good alternative to the lost Archibald's Wharf green space. I think that's completely out of touch with the reality of the needs of the community. We can celebrate and honour our past, our ancestors, and our traditions without forgetting that there are still families trying to build a life here, up against considerable challenges that no amount of monuments will solve. Unless perhaps it's a very large one in a National Park that would be a significant tourism draw. ;) We don't need a bronze statue of Kevin Saccary hugging a welcome sign in Louisbourg. We need the Destination Louisbourg plan to go forward and bring visitors and spending to the heart of the downtown. If the intent to remove certain flags is real, then I think it probably reflects some very careless judgement at minimum. For instance, I'm assuming that in addition to the others slated for removal, Germany wouldn't be showing up either? Would the United States be permitted?
[comment deleted] Posted
kim sheppard Follow Me
$5000 does seem like quite a cost for stickers......considering our weather conditions, this wasn't a good choice to begin with. I am looking into a few things. Tara maybe you and I can get together and make a little plan to Save our Melting Pot & The Pier !!
[comment deleted] Posted
Parker Donham Follow Me
Thank you for reporting Rod's efforts to improve Polar Bear Beach and the neglected tennis courts. I wasn't aware of these admirable projects. However, you should be aware that Rod often acts as an unpleasant troll on social media, firing off personal insults toward those he disagrees with or dislikes for whatever reason. That might explain Councillor MacLeod's touchiness.
Wayne O'Toole Follow Me
Rod Gale is a great guy. He is frustrated by complete lack of any effort by he current council. He calls it like he sees it and is a respected man. To tell him to "shut up" shows the mindset that Jim will do whatever he likes no matter what his citizens think. It shows a backwards, old man mentality that wants nothing to do with transparency but instead to work behind closed doors and not for the people who elected him. Sorry Parker but I still cannot understand your defense of bad politicians...you seems to be part of that team no matter what. People are frustrated, frustrated people call out politicians...this is democracy and freedom of speech....if Jim was doing his job maybe he would not be in the line of fire.
Parker Donham Follow Me
Oh for heaven's sake, you're overreacting. MacLeod said, "If you can't say something nice, shut up." It's not exactly a profane tirade. Have Cape Bretoners suddenly become so prissy we can't mix it up a little? Not according to Rod Gale. He's been saying far worse things, far more often, for decades. He loves to dish it out. Expecting the occasional spirited response goes with the territory.
Joe Ward My Post Follow Me
I didn't see the part where Wayne characterized Jim's comment as a "profane tirade". Are you playing t-ball? Place your own ball on the tee. Smack it just inside the foul line for a stand up double. And then suggest it was a fastball someone pitched to you? ;) Note: Rod Gale is not an elected councillor for the CBRM. He's a frustrated citizen.
Wayne O'Toole Follow Me
We are not over reacting. Jim has done nothing for his community....Rod has. Rod called him out on it and is frustrated like many in CBRM with our government. I did not say anything about a profane tirade, so take about excluding facs, you are intentionally making false claims to prove your point...Fox news train you? Jim is a councillor, as such he should expect criticism, as a matter of fact he should welcome it and mitigate it. Quite easy, Rod does community work and is vocal about his councillors lack of effort, send out public works to aid him...thank him for his hard work and community service. Done deal...he makes an potential fan. If people are suppose to "shut up" when they don't feel government is working for them or the community, then we no longer have a democracy. We get it Parker, you are buddies with the current crew and it shows, but we have the right to express opinions on his statement on a news network, and we arenot journalists just concerned citizens. Also, l never liked your bully style comments...your way or the highway...big superior award winning reporter who knows better then the "cheap seats" I guess
Parker Donham Follow Me
You see what I mean? You can't acknowledge an honest difference of opinion. The only way I could possibly disagree with you is because I'm "buddies" with "the current crew." For the record, I have not spoken to Jim MacLeod for at least five years. We had occasional interactions when I was communications director for the Sydney Tar Ponds agency, and he made representations on behalf of his constituents. (For example, the fence around a portion of Coke Ovens Brook at the upper end of Frederick St. was erected at Jim's suggestion because some of his constituents were worried people on 4-wheelers might get injured in the gully formed by the riverbed.) We're not pals or buddies or even friends. He's just a guy I had occasional, always respectful interactions with years in the past. It's a tired debate tactic. If you can't counter someone's argument, attack them personally. "You're only saying that because [insert lie here]."
Joe Ward My Post Follow Me
Councillor Jim MacLeod wasn't elected to only represent people that are really happy with him, heap praise upon him, and have no requests for help in the community. He was elected to represent everyone in his district, even those with concerns. And, yes, even those not pleased with his performance or the lack thereof. As a communications professional, you choose your words very wisely. I'm certain that you would not have advised a client to talk to the CBC and tell one of his constituents to "shut up". It would show bad judgement and crankiness, not readiness to help. Providing a drum for garbage and a few posts delivered might have made Mr. Gale one of his most appreciative future allies. If not, it certainly would have mitigated some of the warranted criticism.
Parker Donham Follow Me
I'm not condoning MacLeod's choice of words, Joe, I'm pointing out that you left out pertinent context that is obviously relevant to MacLeod's reaction. You painted Gale as a community-minded saint and MacLeod's outburst as unprovoked and out of the blue. I was unaware of Gale's admirable community work, and I'm glad to know about it. Thank you. However. I am well aware of Gale's long history of nasty personal attacks on social media and in letters columns, so I'm not surprised that a councillor known for speaking plainly put a mildly acerbic spin on an old, familiar saying. Yes, councillors are elected to represent all their constituents, but that doesn't oblige them to suffer personal attacks in silence. By the same token, practicing journalism in a social forum doesn't relieve you of the obligation to tell the whole story. There's another old saying that's pertinent here: If you step into the ring, don't be shocked if you get a punch in the nose.
Joe Ward My Post Follow Me
Ha ha. I enjoy sharing info and ideas, and inviting discussion, but I have no desire towards journalism. But, on that note, Wendy Bergfeldt had a short but interesting discussion with Mary Campbell about "point of view" journalism in her Cape Breton Spectator launch interview. Check it out. Now, before you take that as meaning I don't hold myself to any standard: I'm a part of the next gen that doesn't require any such designation in order to express an idea to whatever audience is available, on any platform. Traditional journalism output is still a great source of data for me to draw from, but the more I observe content coming from those considered as journalists, in multiple mediums, the less the designation appears to actually mean anything beyond simply possessing a diploma in the field (if that). I dig into the topics that interest me, I do my exploration, I share my perspective, and I offer it up for conversation. I don't censor comments, and I respond when challenged. And it's evident I often do more research than the local paper writers. But how about what I wrote in this article/blog/post/what-have-you? Does the following sound like the depiction of a "saint" (your injected word)? ### Although there are folks that might not like what he has to say, or how he says it, it’s a good bet that his message will be delivered in Cape Breton real talk. As a straightforward guy, he doesn’t leave much room for confusion. So it’s easier to dodge him than pretend you don’t understand his concerns. And that’s precisely what some elected officials sometimes try to do. Much of what he puts out on social media is uncensored . But it’s not the type of NSFW stuff you can easily dismiss. Rod has something that many others dabbling in social media activism don’t. ### And, as I said: "Unfortunately for Mr. MacLeod, communication and dealing with complaints from residents is a part of the job." If he can't handle it, time to step aside.
Parker Donham Follow Me
Funny, not like you to dodge the one point I'm making, Joe. No need for a lot of "next gen" journalism theory. How about, "My bad. I should have told the whole story. I'll do better next time." That would suffice.
Joe Ward My Post Follow Me
I didn't dodge it. I demonstrated that you skewed/falsely characterized what I wrote with positioning language. Where do you get "saint" when I said what he says is NSFW (not suitable for work), or "might not like what he has to say or *how he says it*"? Rod certainly isn't "prissy". I don't think he's a saint and didn't suggest he was. He definitely "mix[es] it up a little", like you seemed to appreciate in a comment above. He sounded well meaning and friendly in his CBC interviews with Steve Sutherland. Link wasn't working or I'd share here now. I like your work, a great deal. But I'm always left wondering why you have to inject words into stuff to make it easier to strengthen your point. It really seems to me that you could have questioned the accuracy of my article without exaggerating the tone of what I actually wrote. You might even have a history of Mr. Gale's interactions that I'm not aware of. He criticizes politicians online, and he calls them out for stuff he doesn't appreciate. But what I observed about him, with an objective lens, is that he cares about his community and that's where his complaints come from. Jim MacLeod should have gotten him a few things. It's hard to believe public works couldn't come up with a 45 gallon drum. Protocol? Ah, they don't need to be so prissy. Just drop it off the same way they would to a friend's driveway if there was some extra gravel or asphalt on the back of a truck. ;) https://twitter.com/search?q=from%3Asouthbarguy%20thanks%20-playing&src=typd P.S. Check out his fav book, a few tweets down. :)
Parker Donham Follow Me
No. Your original post spent 785 words calling out Coun. MacLeod for his mildly intemperate twist on a lesson mothers have taught children for generations. You made no mention of Gale's well-known penchant for nasty personal attacks. Not one word. That's not honest. It's putting your thumb on the journalistic scale. And, yes, you ARE practicing journalism. Day in and day out, you report, comment, and (most often) pontificate on whatever topic crosses your mental horizon. Mistakes are inevitable when you churn out material at this rate. (Hell, I make six mistakes before breakfast.) Show a little humility. Admit it when you screw up. It would look good on you—a lot better than doubling down on your one-sideD portrayal of MacLeod. V. Gale.
Wayne O'Toole Follow Me
Have a good day parker, this is not "journalism, its a posting site where people display information as they see it. Rods way of communicating his frustration works. But the greater point is he is involved with the community and in making it better. The difference is Rods comments on politics comes from this frustration...Jims telling him to "shut up" comes from being called out on his inaction. There is a big difference. Also it is not Robs job to ensure parks, beaches and tennis courts in his community are in good repair and his does it, pays for it or gets things donated out of care for his community...he does not get paid. Jim howevet does and let them slide. He got called out on it and used an antiquated phrase my grandmother would use. My grandfather however would say, if you believe something is wrong you speak up and do something about it....like Rod has. Nobody said he was an angel but his actions in his community show he is a good guy. He is also respecred in his community, in the union he is involved with and for calling out politician for slackung.
Wayne O'Toole Follow Me
Also Parker...have a look at the facebook comments below...who do you think has more respect for the responses...Rod, the man who speaks up and takes his own action to solve his communities problems, or Jim for his lack of effort and for his idea that people should shut up if nothing nice can be said? Sometimes if a persons actions deserve a negative response then they asked for it. Freedom of speech in a free and democratic society does not and should not include "shut up"...and sure Jim has the same freedom but we are allowed to call him out on it as well. I look at actions and in this case Rods action speak volumes of who he is.
Joe Ward My Post Follow Me
Word count, irrelevant. Implying it was all calling out Mr. MacLeod, inaccurate. "Mildly intemperate twist on a lesson mothers... " suggests you'd rather be writing a novel than going back and forth with one of the "next gen". ;) You're right: I didn't write what *you* apparently would have written. You're wrong: I didn't write what you'd like to suggest that I did. (More on this bit at the bottom) Journalism: Irrelevant. I wasn't much interested in it when you were squabbling over that topic with Mary Campbell and Tera Camus at goCB or in the CB Post. And I'm definitely not interested in it as it relates to me. But you're free to choose a label for me if you feel it necessary. People will struggle with that for a while, especially as I experiment with new topics and new content formats. :) "Pontificate": If that's a dismissive way of referencing strong opinion, expressed in detail and at length, then whatever works. I'm sure many agree with you wholeheartedly. I *try* to avoid scaling back my views in order to make them more palatable, as much as possible. Mistakes: You're right. I'm horrible on typos, grammar, and run on sentences. However, I also didn't suggest I don't make mistakes. I just didn't agree with your objections on this particular topic. I would rather you prove your case, than simply ask me to accept your case. Note: You might have done so successfully, but you did *it* again. Instead of breaking down what I actually did, you tried to mischaracterize it first, and then you critiqued the version you imagined it was. Example: You decided that I made him out to be a "saint", when the language certainly doesn't suggest it in any way. Any of us can defeat an argument if we get to alter what the other person said first. Fox News does it all the time. ;) Mother Teresa didn't use NSFW or uncensored language, as I attributed to Mr. Gale, did she? The monster? http://bit.ly/2aWyRLu His origins? http://bit.ly/2aWxBbj
Wayne O'Toole Follow Me
Thank you Joe. I truly see Parkers style here on social media as "Fox news style". And not an attack before you twist that too. Here is why 1) you take liberties with statements, change them completely to strengthen your case 2) you provide no relevant opposing data and just demand people take your point of view as pure truth. I don't claim mine to be sole truth, only a well thought out opinion based on data available. How long have you lived in Cape Breton? You think you would be used to style like Rods, which can work very well. Also, you do realise other people are educated too right, its not just you. I have a degree in business, 2 dilpomas (electronics and law) and 52 (working on more) professional certifications. I am an expert in knowing my audience and what tone and language works best on which audience. Rods style got results, was a win in my books. And as for my friend comment, or attack...you admitted to being good friends with Cecils key players in the last attack on Mary Campbell's qualifications when her writing is doing good in the community. I actually subscribed for 1 year...I do not read your blog. Sorry but its the way you come off in posts like this that turn me completely off your writing style.
Teresa McNutt Follow Me
Mr. MacLeod used to hang up on me when I called him about issues.
Wayne O'Toole Follow Me
See action speaks louder then words. A councillor who hangs up on a resident is a poor leader
Wayne O'Toole Follow Me
And these are reasons to vote him out. If you cannot speak with someone from your community but instead hang up you are not fit for the job or paycheque
Donelda MacDonald Follow Me
Fifteen years ago I returned to CB, fresh out of grad school and full of ideas. I wanted to volunteer so I contacted Elizabeth Beaton at CBU (then UCCB). She helped me join the Whitney Pier Development Association and together, with the association's support, we started a multi-ethnic, class driven community newspaper to highlight the good and the diversity in Whitney Pier. At the time, I called Councillor Jim MacLeod to ask a few questions for the paper. He was livid and I would say more than a little crazed. He actually hollered at me!? Councillor MacLeod demanded to know where I lived and wanted to know why I thought I had the right to ask him a question (I was living on Inglis St at the time). I explained to him that I lived in CBRM so I should be able to ask him a question as he was a councillor. He barked at me some more and then hung up. I found him to be unreasonable, inarticulate, and not particularly smart. Sorry Parker D., I always appreciated you and Harry Flemming’s CBC debates and I know Rod may be outspoken at times but MacLeod is not fit for CBRM council- and never has been! For the record, I did move to Whitney Pier but have since left (tried to buy a house there but found a cheaper one elsewhere).

Facebook Comments

View all the LATEST
and HOTTEST posts
View

Share this comment by copying the direct link.

  • Our Sponsors

Using this website is subject to the Terms of Use that contain binding contractual terms.